Sorry, guys! During system maintenance, some functions like comment are unavailable.

I'm torn.. romanticizing this is

annehime May 28, 2017 7:53 am

I'm torn.. romanticizing this is sick and weird since both boys hurt and killed people.. but why the author need to draw sangwoo like a demi-god, then have him be a sociopathic murderer, then have him be very logical and caring towards Bum at times.. ugh the uncle is giving me the creeps none of harada's works ever gave me.. or Itou-san series.. I wuv this.. she made Sangwoo like your demented prince charming.. hul

Responses
    Anonymous May 27, 2017 10:48 am

    Romanticizing? In what ways? There's a fine line between fiction and reality. And I think readers are smart enough and are aware enough of the distinction of the two.

    ayumu May 27, 2017 2:19 pm

    just because he is a criminal, doesnt mean his appearance should be bad. as kids, we were taught that bad guys/monsters look ugly and frightening. as we grow up, we can see that's not true. that's it.

    annehime May 27, 2017 5:22 pm
    Romanticizing? In what ways? There's a fine line between fiction and reality. And I think readers are smart enough and are aware enough of the distinction of the two. @Anonymous

    I think it's pretty obvious what the author was trying to portray, by the way of drawing and scenes.. the way the bodies alone are drawn to perfection has an intent to romanticize.. don't get what you're saying about fine-line though.. how old are you to even be talking about fiction and reality.. geez..

    Jusko May 27, 2017 5:51 pm
    I think it's pretty obvious what the author was trying to portray, by the way of drawing and scenes.. the way the bodies alone are drawn to perfection has an intent to romanticize.. don't get what you're sayin... annehime

    Pretty sure he/she's more mature than you, if you've been triggered by a civil statement/question. Just because the art is "pretty" doesn't automatically mean the author intended it for romanticizing purposes. Just because it's in a form of pretty drawing doesn't automatically make its contents any less grave than it should be. Romanticizing is pretty subjective and depends upon how a person interprets the work.

    annehime May 28, 2017 7:49 am

    What are you talking about? Just dislike my comment and be done with it. Don't spout nonsense and topics you assume and know nothing about. Gah, can't a reader just have fun and comment. People are so serious all the time, this isn't the classroom and lit class.

    wuf May 28, 2017 12:55 pm
    What are you talking about? Just dislike my comment and be done with it. Don't spout nonsense and topics you assume and know nothing about. Gah, can't a reader just have fun and comment. People are so serious a... annehime

    That's why the comment section has a reply button. To discuss a piece of literature. You don't need to be in a classroom to do such a thing. Why? Because for them it's interesting and/or fun.

    Jojo May 28, 2017 3:06 pm
    What are you talking about? Just dislike my comment and be done with it. Don't spout nonsense and topics you assume and know nothing about. Gah, can't a reader just have fun and comment. People are so serious a... annehime

    I agree. Clearly that anon doesn't know what they are talking about. It's clearly not about the art being "pretty" but abut framing: what the author chooses to include in a frame and what they choose to leave out. Showing so much of a character's body parts that would usually becovered beneath clothing, and doing it so often, has the same intend as showing all the graphic details in a sex scene, and doing it in lots of different, graphic, sex scenes. If they don't think that doesn't hint at author's intention, individual readers' interpretation notwthstanding, then they should at least take a storyboard course in order to chip in this conversation.

    Anonymous May 29, 2017 6:31 am
    I think it's pretty obvious what the author was trying to portray, by the way of drawing and scenes.. the way the bodies alone are drawn to perfection has an intent to romanticize.. don't get what you're sayin... annehime

    There's nothing wrong if the work is romanticized. Because people are smart enough to know it's just fiction. That was my point. You seem to be under the impression that I replied to your post with hostility? Because I wasn't.

    Anonymous May 29, 2017 6:34 am
    I think it's pretty obvious what the author was trying to portray, by the way of drawing and scenes.. the way the bodies alone are drawn to perfection has an intent to romanticize.. don't get what you're sayin... annehime

    Also, it's best if you lay off of your ad hominems. Be a good sport. You don't have to make it personal just because you didn't like what you heard. Handle yourself with decorum next time.

    Anonymous May 29, 2017 4:29 pm
    Also, it's best if you lay off of your ad hominems. Be a good sport. You don't have to make it personal just because you didn't like what you heard. Handle yourself with decorum next time. @Anonymous

    You used an Ignoratio elenchi "There's a fine line between fiction and reality" and a generalization "people are smart enough to know it's just fiction". And you wonder why the original poster got triggered?

    Anonymous May 29, 2017 11:17 pm
    You used an Ignoratio elenchi "There's a fine line between fiction and reality" and a generalization "people are smart enough to know it's just fiction". And you wonder why the original poster got triggered? @Anonymous

    I think I made my point clear to you in the comment above to justify my first comment. It's quite very relevant to the post, I have not subdued to the elenchi principle. Remember decorum. @annehime

    Anonymous May 29, 2017 11:20 pm
    You used an Ignoratio elenchi "There's a fine line between fiction and reality" and a generalization "people are smart enough to know it's just fiction". And you wonder why the original poster got triggered? @Anonymous

    I even generalized, so that there isn't any attack on the person itself. Also because it applies to other people to so ┑( ̄Д  ̄)┍

    Anonymous May 29, 2017 11:21 pm
    You used an Ignoratio elenchi "There's a fine line between fiction and reality" and a generalization "people are smart enough to know it's just fiction". And you wonder why the original poster got triggered? @Anonymous

    In case you skipped this:

    "There's nothing wrong if the work is romanticized. Because people are smart enough to know it's just fiction. That was my point."

    Anonymous May 29, 2017 11:23 pm
    You used an Ignoratio elenchi "There's a fine line between fiction and reality" and a generalization "people are smart enough to know it's just fiction". And you wonder why the original poster got triggered? @Anonymous

    Why get triggered to such a non-hostile, civil statement?

    annehime May 30, 2017 2:17 pm
    just because he is a criminal, doesnt mean his appearance should be bad. as kids, we were taught that bad guys/monsters look ugly and frightening. as we grow up, we can see that's not true. that's it. ayumu

    You wer taught that? I wasnt, nobody told me what bad guys should look like, only how they act, I'm not surrounded by superficial people, and then there's also the news so..

    annehime May 30, 2017 2:21 pm
    I agree. Clearly that anon doesn't know what they are talking about. It's clearly not about the art being "pretty" but abut framing: what the author chooses to include in a frame and what they choose to leave o... @Jojo

    My point exactly, the body language and the framing and the psychological insinuation of that.. that's why I'm wondering if I'm replying to a kid or something.. Preaching about 'judging through superficial looks' is so kindergarten.. I'm just letting them be.

    Anonymous May 30, 2017 11:05 pm
    You wer taught that? I wasnt, nobody told me what bad guys should look like, only how they act, I'm not surrounded by superficial people, and then there's also the news so.. annehime

    You see things as black and white. Some people are taught not to judge a book by its cover. Look at Sangwoo, he's a fucking saint to other people. Clearly he's the devil incarnate.

    Anonymous May 30, 2017 11:06 pm
    My point exactly, the body language and the framing and the psychological insinuation of that.. that's why I'm wondering if I'm replying to a kid or something.. Preaching about 'judging through superficial loo... annehime

    Did you not read the replies above? Lol

    Anny May 30, 2017 11:54 pm
    Did you not read the replies above? Lol @Anonymous

    Clearly not.

    Anonymous May 31, 2017 12:02 am
    Clearly not. @Anny

    Lol ignorance is a bliss.