I get that for a lot of readers that Q&A would be new ( it's not, it's was release way back in season 1) but still, it's interesting how people are taking these questions as selective interpretation to say the author declared that Seungho will be having real life consequences.
Author replying about real life Seungho :This kind belongs in jail Author replying about fictional Seungho: He can be happy, why not? ( opposite of the answer above)
This is the heart of the two different of people reading this story.
If you can't make peace with the fact that the author is showing here that you are not expected to take her fictional character Seungho as you would see a real life Seungho, you will be frustrated with this story.
The two answers above is only a contradiction for the people who can't accept that people (and the author) are okay with Seungho being happy at the end exactly because he is a fictional character. The author is saying the opposite of what some people are saying in here: her story and character is not bound to the real life moral consequences of their actions. That is even clearer if you take this Q&A back to the time it was written and watch the hints of where this story is going or the art that the author is promoting.
The sad part of this is that some readers who are all giggly with this Q&A thinking that the author meant she will deliver a social justice kind of story will probably refer to this to say the author fooled them.
I get that for a lot of readers that Q&A would be new ( it's not, it's was release way back in season 1) but still, it's interesting how people are taking these questions as selective interpretation to say the author declared that Seungho will be having real life consequences.
Author replying about real life Seungho :This kind belongs in jail
Author replying about fictional Seungho: He can be happy, why not? ( opposite of the answer above)
This is the heart of the two different of people reading this story.
If you can't make peace with the fact that the author is showing here that you are not expected to take her fictional character Seungho as you would see a real life Seungho, you will be frustrated with this story.
The two answers above is only a contradiction for the people who can't accept that people (and the author) are okay with Seungho being happy at the end exactly because he is a fictional character. The author is saying the opposite of what some people are saying in here: her story and character is not bound to the real life moral consequences of their actions. That is even clearer if you take this Q&A back to the time it was written and watch the hints of where this story is going or the art that the author is promoting.
The sad part of this is that some readers who are all giggly with this Q&A thinking that the author meant she will deliver a social justice kind of story will probably refer to this to say the author fooled them.