They're drawings, they don't exist and they are teenagers, not children
you sound like someone who likes lolis
do u enjoy lolicon?
dis was a bit on the creepy side
Ehm no
No
alright because even if its a drawing theyre still minors. even if its not real putting them in the situation is weird.
You're right but i think that if you think fiction affect reality and all you shouldn't read manga or watch anime or anything that involves fiction
sounds like preditor behavior to me
Wtf man
Wtf is wrong with you, it's still sexualizing minors, fake or not, if a pedo is jacking off to children, fiction or not it still counts.
PURRRRRR FAX NO PRINTER
You should focus on rl pedos not someone who does nothing to no one
And I was talking about teenagers, children are not 17
Still minors. And a pedo is a pedo. If we use your logic. If a pedo texts a minor (also a teen is still a minor in most countries) and acts sexual towards them and flirts with them you are saying it doesn’t count because it’s online? Anyone who is attracted to children needs to get help. Most actually pedophiles who are into minors reading fictional things want to do it to real children and use it as a substitute. Eventually those urges get so strong that they manifest it in real life. You act like “IRL” pedos just come out of nowhere. And don’t revert the conversation to “They are 17” because that’s not what we are talking about. We are talking about how you said “it’s just fiction.” We can have a polite conversation about this but let’s not try to change the topic.
Also, teens 13-17 are still minors/children so..what? If they are a teen (13) anyone can have at them and it should be normalized?
A teen’s brain isn’t fully developed to be able to consent.
*Most actual (not sure how to edit comments lol)
purrrrr
pls dont forget theyre literally children