Calling fictional content CP is extremely ignorant, i hope you’re aware of this. This is in no way pornographic content that includes children, nor does it harm children, as these are drawings that do not exist, have no feelings nor consciousness. Comparing such a thing to something vile, traumatising and absolutely disgusting is honestly just tone deaf.
Hello! Hi! We were sexually abused as a child. Please don't use our trauma to make your point. Drawing cp is cp! Harada is a good example of an author drawing CP well, but definitely not many do.
You make me sick. <33 actually kys, and remember. That not many people will miss you. Especially since you defended child porn!
~ Styx.
Hey! I’m in no way defending CP. Call THIS what it is, it’s at most CSEM (child sexual exploitation material) because it doesn’t involve actual children. There was no actual (physical) child hurt by this.
- Yaoi seme :3
You just wore lmfao, if you draw CP, it's illegal. 'To clarify, under federal law, drawing and animation are considered child pornography, and you can be convicted for possession or marketing of such material.' Just admit your wrong, and if you're mocking are disorder? LMFAO.
Perverts are drawing this mostly, i don't mind shit like Love so pure, showing what CSA can do. And Urah loves Nii-chan because they can't relate to it.
But defending child porn? Wow, I hope you choke and burn at the same time.
- Styx
CP by definition and laws of some countries includes fictional drawing and just because it is not “as bad” like you think it is doesn’t exclude it from being one. What even more tone deaf is that you saying that these fictional contents “doesn’t harm children”, go educate yourself about the effect of comics on children brain and its readers instead getting here babbling about whether I should call fictional content cp or not miss “yaoi seme” xx
GO OFFFFF!!!!
-styx
any content involving kids like this is disgusting and wrong, full-stop. There’s nothing to debate here, it’s wrong point blank period.
There are real harmful implications from this that you may not see with your eyes. Take you for example. You’re perpetuating the idea that CP is okay as long as it doesn’t include real kids. This story allows you to think because it’s not real, CP of this kind is alright. You actually defending the assault of a child even if fictional,is something you need to address. Like that’s not okay, it’s serious dude. Really think about your angle here.
You expect a person who calls themselves seme to actually listen? Lol.
~ Urah
but it is fictional cp.............what are u on?
I’m sorry to say this but you’re fucking disgusting, just because it’s 2D doesn’t mean it’s not as harmful as actual CP! This sort of shit enables and gives a safe space for sick fucks that enjoy jacking off to minors and that is NOT OK and is just as valid as “actual” CP.
This art is “vile, traumatising and absolutely disgusting” and honestly you dismissing that because it’s fiction is honestly “tone deaf”
Also any sort of depiction of a child in a vulnerable state is harmful for other children because it only fuels and encourages pedophilia so I honestly don’t understand what you’re yapping about.
Drawing CP well?? I dont think harada has ever done that there is no good way to draw CP
Hitohira was in highschool when there was explicit imagery of him being sexually abused, legally speaking this wouldnt be considered illustrated child pornography in most countries. They usually draw the line once the characters are under the age of 15. He is a minor though so i understand your discomfort.
I think Urah means Nii-chan. They mean talking about the pyschological affects of being sexual abused. It just came out wrong.
Death
OHHHH yeah yeah that makes more but Harada was definitely didnt need to do wat they did, if it was removed from here it mustve been BAD.
more sense*
Nii-chan is mostly the ouroboros affect. The abused turning into the abuser, it's a lot like this showing a young child being taken advantage of but the child is a lot longer. It basically talks about how it's a cycle and why it's needed to break the cycle of abuse.
- Styx
does it show it as explicitly as this??? If it does its acceptable but if its worse it not, why was it even removed?? I mean it doesnt show the childs genitals or the hole to penetration does it?
Ah wait, its a under 14 child right? i forgot. Does it show the child being sexually abused as explicitly as this? If it does even if the message of the story is good it would still be unacceptable.
I honestly don't remember. But probably because it got taken off.
-Styx
Oh well alright, im not gonna read it just in case but thank you
UMM THESE TYPE OF STORIES + HARADA NEED TO STOP LIKE SRSLY NO 2D CP PLS