why did the seme have to be a child

That's not a paedophilia!!! Go search on dictionary!!!
And don't tell me that you see the student as an innocent victim, come on read the atmosphere. Can you ??

I did check the dictionary!!!!!!!!!!!
Which definition did you come across???????????

He's not under 10!!!!

please show me the source and definition of what you're trying to say!!!!!!!

No but please

I don't think it's pedophilia, bc he's a teenager, it's another word, but I forgot what it is (and yes, it does sound like something a pedo would say). Anyway, the teacher was attracted to the Dom before he even knew he was a HS student. The biggest problem was that his uncle let him do that shit in HIS establishment and that the teacher kept seeing him after seeing that he was a HS student (so he was probably 17-18yo).

"The DSM-5 requires that a person must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child or children they are aroused by, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilic disorder. Similarly, the ICD-11 excludes sexual behavior among post-pubertal children who are close in age." Wikipedia~

And why should an Indian reading a Japanese book be concerned by what AMERICANS define pedophilia as????????????

I'm not even from America, Its meaning is international. "Prepubescent literally means the child has not yet gone through puberty. On average girls start puberty at 11 and boys start at 12, so generally a pre-pubescent child will be younger then 11–12 years old." And any older than that against a minor is just called s3xual offend & not pedophilia. But if it makes you feel better, here another source (You asked for a source yourself , BTW): https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-laws-against-pedophilia-in-India-How-does-the-Indian-judicial-system-define-pedophilia

Are you actually insane? Stop trying to be technical and use some common sense. It can still be considered as that if it's an adult going after anyone under 18 as they're not adults. Why are you trying so hard to defend it? Disgusting

You have real issues. Go see a doctor

Real life. It’s ridiculous how many people can’t be bothered to research. I’m not saying I approve. I’m saying it isn’t pedophilia

Pedophilia is by definition prepubescent. That doesn’t apply here. I’m not saying I approve, I’m saying this is not pedophilia…

Me and the others here are not trying to defend. We are saying that it's NOT called pedophilia! It has other words meaning. Sheesh. But guess it's useless to explain you that. Use other words for it.

Agreed. Pedophilia is not the correct terminology in this case. I do not agree with the behavior, but it isn’t pedophilia