No but i agree with them The author should have used another creative way.
It's just a pervert way of writing.
nah you ppl are just children who are closed-minded
If not liking the idea of saving the girl by having sex with her is closed minded i good with that i ike my close mind
then stay in your rainbow and happy go lucky lane. clearly you didn't understand the manhua
No i understand it but i dont like the way they did this part
I think a lot of people forget where and what time this is set, back in the days fathers are allowed to make decisions like this for their daughters. I’m not denying it’s bad but it’s kinda realistic. And it was to save her not just for his desires
Have sex with girl or she dies
Mc:let her die
Her father:please save her
Fl:please save her
Doctor:your the only one who can save her
He finally saves her even after he DIDNT want to
And please define rape
To sexual assult someone against there will
The girl he saved is not offended or traumatized but thankful
But he still the bad guy I don't get you
I'm pretty sure your modern views are affecting your judgment or you mean letting her die was
The best outcome . so using your mordern understanding her living was not a needed factor? And no he is not at all like his father no in the slightest or do you have to re-read the it you to get your facts straight ? I don't condone rape but he is a leader who has to make tough decisions and sacrifices
I am criticizing the idea of having to cure a person through this way.
They wanna act as if he wanted to do it willingly. Like he didnt even wanna be there bc he had someone he loved and he didnt want to disrespect his love but they ultimately had to weigh what was more important to them and the father begged him because he didnt want his daughter to die knowing that there were other options that could have led to her being alive.
Oh my God, we are talking about the author leave the characters alone.
AND I WASNT TALKING TO YOU? i was adding onto the initial tweet. Do you see me replying to your statement? Like im not even disagreeing that it's on the author for putting them in that situation. Think a little, I was talking to the OP not YOU. If i was talking to u i wouldve hit the reply button. Tf out of here.
Like pls show me WHERE exactly am i disagreeing with you here? Like mfer just want to jump in without thinking like dont piss me off. I wasnt talking to you nor was i even referring to whatever conversation yall were having. Self-centered ass response.
If i wanted to reply to u or to be involved in whatever conversation yall were having i wouldve hit the reply button, like this. But i wasnt. And you're just going around responding to me as if i was talking to you when i wasnt even doing that.
And the "they" i am talking about obv wasnt referring to you? Because there are people in the comments literally blaming the characters. Like not everything is about you just because I replied to a common you just so happened to be under. Like dont talk to me tf
*comment
touch some grass lol
wow, seek therapy
Ikr?? What does the author thinking when they did that??
Did you really think ppl read historical webtoon when they're too realistic to past events? Like its for entertainment not for another knowledge.
yall stressing the he grape that woman but did he do that for his own sexual pleasure? if not for the father begging he wouldn’t even think getting involved in that situation. yall ought to stfu, if you do not like it get outta here