I do like that Rashta is given a lot of insight. She's not just a villain with a one chapter backstory. She's a real villain, painting herself as a tragic victim and never once accepting any wrongdoing, even though she's done so, so many evil things.
She denies all guilt because she wasn't born wealthy or loved, she doesn't understand love at all. Like the journalist still looking for his sister (that she jailed/ murdered) or those adoptive parents of hers that are also greedy and wicked, but have never stopped looking for their lost children.
I don't think Rashta would have been any different is she had been born wealthy, she would have been so much worse.
I do like that Rashta is given a lot of insight. She's not just a villain with a one chapter backstory. She's a real villain, painting herself as a tragic victim and never once accepting any wrongdoing, even though she's done so, so many evil things.
She denies all guilt because she wasn't born wealthy or loved, she doesn't understand love at all. Like the journalist still looking for his sister (that she jailed/ murdered) or those adoptive parents of hers that are also greedy and wicked, but have never stopped looking for their lost children.
I don't think Rashta would have been any different is she had been born wealthy, she would have been so much worse.