Shota con. A fuckin shota con
liking fictional characters is different from liking real people and since I'm not familiar with this author may I know what real child are they attracted to?
If an artist starts making porn of animals and humans having sex are they suddenly not a zoophile just cuz it’s fictional? I’m not arguing I’m just using ur own logic in a different example
yeah, drawings aren't material organisms. it can give you an ick but it ain't hurting anyone. just as murder is okay in fiction, everything else is okay in fiction too. I'm of the opinion that everything can be done in fiction because it's infinitely better than it happening in real life. we got more horrors happening in real life that are inhuman and should be stopped. someone beating their meat to gross drawings isn't the same as violating another life.
I’d say things aren’t black and white like that. Some things are ok in fiction but not all of it. Just like how watching a lot of porn can make u an addict. Reading or better yet drawing images of sexualised minors will have negative effects on you. Sure you’re only attracted to fictional petite feminine characters that look like they’re 13 but are technically 147372yrs old. But what if it goes too far? It’s very easy to brainwash people. And just like how a lot of porn can make you sexually frustrated and a lot of hate speech can make you bigoted, material that sexualises minors can do bad things too
Minor is defined as: someone who is too young to have the legal responsibilities of an adult. Fictional characters don't have legal responsibilities so 'sexualised minors' can only mean drawing real people. Sexualising real children is bad and should be punished but drawing fictional people of small stature isn't hurting anyone. The character can be 5 seconds old or 8 millions years old and it doesn't matter because they are a drawing of a fictional character. I stand with my opinion that it's infinitely better for people to use fiction to do whatever they have the urge to. Let them abuse pixels because I would rather see it than another sick fucker abusing children. Many people are mentally ill so it's easier for them to fall into addiction. More should be done to improve the overall well-being of people but policing what can be done in fiction doesn't solve anything. Murder is okay in fiction and you don't see murderers all over the streets.
People abusing pixels very easily go on to the real thing, paedophiles aren't known for their self control
Idk why but this reminded me of that one Twitter artist who abuses his blind OC omg I felt so bad for herrrrr
Using that logic, intrusive thoughts should have no consequences either right? They’re just thoughts you’d never go as far as to do the real thing. Except it can go that far, repressing intrusive thoughts makes them worse and a lot of ‘normal’ people who did bad things simply followed that voice in their head. Also, instincts are a thing and when you’re very reliant on them it can lead to bad things like ´wanting to experience the real deal because a bunch of pixels on the screen can only do so much’
I’m sorry if my thoughts are jumbled I didn’t know how to organise them lol
But yeah, if I had to choose I’d rather have pedos satisfy themselves with fictional characters rather than real children, but that doesn’t mean we should actively make more content than them, that’s why I hate family blogs, it’s a goldmine for pedos
I'm starting to think the author likes underage boys