“top” they’re both in high school boy be quiet.
Exactly these fujoshi need to figure out that not everything has to be sexualized
Brother. You are quite literally on an illegal Yaoi site
BWAHAHAHAHAAHAH they really said "there should be no sex here" under a porn vid, i can't
BUT it's taged as shounen ai so there might be no smut indeed.
But stop acting like people don't or should not have sex in highschool?
Just because you two had no one to love back then doesn't give you the right to pretend you know right from wrong!
bruhh abusive and psychopathic? wait till the next chapter hun and you'll change your mind
you're so nasty.....
they're talking about how we don't need to sexualize MINORS IN HIGH SCHOOL. no one cares if kids in high school fuck, but the author shouldn't and doesn't want to be drawing literal underage kids fucking and selling it bc that's fucked up. you're weird as hell tryna justify that.
porn? it’s lost in the cloud. where is the porn
exactly like the new litc fans are weird
right like this story has nothing to do with sex. it depicts the trauma of two boys and how they heal and grow from it, why tf do people wanna see sex so bad between two underage boys like go read some porn yaoi and leave litc alone...
and then they had the nerve to call it porn
Hahahahahajaja xD
I hate to break it to you but it’s not a yaoi site. it had multiple different types of books to read
We are NOT on mrm rn girlie, we still have horror, mysteries and hentais
tell me you've read litc with your ass without telling me you've read litc with your ass
did you perhaps read litc with your FEET…
Maybe that part wasn't clear enough my bad! But as you saw i said "under a porn vid" as in "i am comparing that situation which i find foolish" to another situation equally as foolish!
So yeah no litc is not a porn and i don't think any of us are reading this in hopes it turns into a porn anyway?? (okay no, maybe there are, let's be real here)
Now to answer you @hatdiggitydog I didn't saw calling someone a "top" as sexualizing a minor but rather as op calling out to a character in particular whose name they don't remember.
BUT putting sexual related terms on someone could be seen as sexualizing them, i guess you're right.
But like i said minors have sex, so in my eyes the reactions were over dramatic.
But (that's a lot of buts sorry bwahahah) i am quite curious about what you find wrong in this context, i'm honestly trying to understand if it's the reader's eye and view thye can have of the characters that perturbs you.
Because when i read the manwha, i'm not like "hmmm children." wtf, i never even thought about the fact that they were minors before because that's not directly relevant to events i see unfolding?
So i'm genuinely curious!
doesn’t matter if minor have sex. but if you show minors having sex that’s call CP and even the author said that they won’t make cirrus and skylar do anything nasty. it’s weird
Yeah sure, but the debate has never been about that ToT christ on a stick there is no god.
But it's fine :3 since we deviated from the subject and both agree on this fact i guess this debate is over
Your topic history says otherwise oop jkjk
Damn
I've never seen someone owning someone else this roughly
i'll never forget this.
Typical obsessive, abusive, psychopath top