But like, that’s what I don’t get. What does the father’s crimes have to do with the son’s potential as a groom? Disregarding him as a potential suitor (when the option of marrying for love was never on the table) can only happen if fl believes ml value is determined by his relation to a crime he didn’t commit. Like my mother (before I was put into foster care) was a criminal. If I met someone and they refused to see me as a person, an individual, and for myself because my mother had hurt them, I would feel wronged. I didn’t commit the crime. Being avoided/rejected/hated for my relationship to her would feel so unfair. Plus fl married ml and had a son with him and fl not only hates ml (who practically worships her) but hates her child too? So she hates the grandchild of her mother’s killer (who wasn’t even born when her mom was killed prob) even though it’s her own child? That’s crazy insane reason to loath innocent people.
chill, the spoiler said she wasnt the original fl during those times she abused her family, i think a part of a somewhat hatred took over (the red haired witch?). but thats not really the case for her, since she's forgiving.
in another sense, you cant really blame her reasoning of not wanting to marry the person, again, she mightve just been infused of overwhelming emotions to say that. opinions change overtime. but, for the reason that why did she still marry him or had a child with him, again, i think, thats not the original fl, as ssome spoiler states.
No really, ml father killed her mum. Keyword = father, as in NOT the male lead. Last I checked children aren’t guilty of their parent’s crimes unless they participate in those crimes. Even adult offspring aren’t guilty of their parent’s crimes. I mean HELLO? Did person A or person B commit the crime? It was person A? Got it. So why are you blaming person B?