+ felt like a delayed speech development to me. It ain't normal for a preschooler beyond 3 years old to still find it difficult to pronounce certain letters. I say normal because it is on the level of uncommon that people obtain speech impediments such as articulation disorders or of sort at such young age.
Oh, I wrote that wrong, lol. What I mean is that she should at least be able to talk more efficiently and clear. She also talk to people, so what's hindering the development? That way of talking ain't cute for a 27 years old. She should know better, as she's literally an adult, reincarnated.
Ignore this one. Too technical and deeply analyzed, lol. This is somewhat real, but as I misclicked the post button, I realized that it's an unnecessary comment. This happens when you comment half-asleep. (￣ε(#￣)Σ
Just FYI, this is absolutely not true. Children are still learning to clearly enunciate various sounds well past the age of 3, regardless of intelligence, particularly certain consonants like [r] and [z]. [s] is also often difficult for small children, hence so many kids having lisps, and so many elementary schools providing speech therapy programs.
I think you read and understood my statements wrong because tbf I wrote it wrong. There are indeed situations like that, but what I stated was based on theorized speech development. Those were subjective and studied on any medical field, focusing on OB or Pedia. It wasn't wrong, just not accurate. Lisp is just one of many conditions in speech impediments of pedias. I already retracted the statement because of how I stated it. It's a general theorized "age" of speech development. It's not supposed to be specific but general—there always gonna be a bracket age, also.
I do understand the confusion and seemed like it's a misinformation, but no. It's just a generalized age mentioned in few to many speech or developmental theories.
I was also confused constructing the statement, so I def do not blame you if it came out negatively. But please ignore the additional. It was somewhat real but it's just a common theory used in my medical field. Times change and people adapt to new knowledge. It was a half-assed comment but I can't delete it Σ( ￣□￣||)
Last take: I HAD TO GO BACK BECAUSE I, MYSELF, GOT CONFUSED W WHAT I WAS TRYING TO SAY, LOL. First of all, I used terms incorrectly. It wasn't a speech delay, she was intelligent due to her past. Secondly, the general "average" age I mentioned was based on stock knowledge that is very unreliable, knowing my memorization skill sucks. Thirdly, yes, the age varies and theories are common standards and I just went objective. Fourth, I forgot my initial point at this moment in time, LOL, so I did read and research materials AGAIN. Lastly, I do understand the issue still, but I want to clarify that lisps is a speech error (I had to reread terms I forgot and confused with) and not definite on every child, temporary but can linger if not corrected at early age.
In conclusion, that additional was still unnecessary and wrong at some points. She's still understandable by age of three (common and not a delay). I don't know why I even started that comment because it's not applicable with how mature she already is.
This is why I also hate my yapping mindset. I just babble and talk nonsense. My bad to the one who replied, tho hehe. Knew I'll get called out for it, I appreciate it a lot. I just hate that I had to comment again to correct my past self.
I don't like the chapter with the tutor. She literally came off that situation unscratched and less punished. In no way does physical punishment nor inflictions a way for educating anyone. I stopped reading immediately.
Yes, Nema is apparently trying to overcome her (?) or whatever, but as a parent, how can you let someone who repeatedly harmed your daughter and what? Scolded the lady and let her teach again. That's unrealistically "understanding" of their side, giving second chances on someone who one-sidedly inflicted pain on their daughter. Everything was wrong in that chapter. Nema's mature reaction for a 4-year-old (not suspicious for the readers, but should be for her family), her parents leniency over a clear malpractice, and the tutor's way of educating a preschooler.
Wdym the mother asked her 4-year-old daughter that couldn't even speak clearly, about how she'll "win over" the tutor? Screw that perfect lady. Someone would be way better than her. ヽ(`Д´)ﾉ