Sorry, guys! During system maintenance, some functions like comment are unavailable.

not to be The Woker but it kindaaa sounds like the subtext is implying that it's less mora...

jurichiiii January 23, 2026 4:43 am

not to be The Woker but it kindaaa sounds like the subtext is implying that it's less morally wrong to rape someone who has been sexually promiscuous in the past. like jjk starts tweaking out because kim dan was a virgin... girl who cares?? you assaulted and coerced him into sex either way?? like "oh it wouldn't be as bad if you were a slut in the first place bc then it don't even count as rape teehee~~" man fuck you

Responses
    miso January 23, 2026 4:55 am

    no bc this is such a valid take i was thinking the same thing, like finding out he didn’t sleep with anyone is the only thing making u remember all of the nasty shit u said/did to him? like huh

    pearlb0mber January 23, 2026 5:29 am

    MY NAME IS THE WOKER, WHY SO QUEERIOUS?

    ok but on a serious note i agree.. its absolutely no difference he still raped him even if he were a hooker or something

    Missyoftheshire January 23, 2026 5:55 am

    BIG AGREE. the only thing I a think of is that they’re trying to imply that he went as hard as he did because he thought he had a lot of experience? But let’s be real,he wouldn’t have been gentle to Dan just because he was a virgin. When he said “why didn’t you tell me something like that happened” I actually lol’d because, bitch?????? As if you would have fucking cared?! He already walked in on Dan almost getting raped by the loan sharks like you damn well knew he had some sexual trauma. Virgin, or not!!!

    demhoes January 23, 2026 12:38 pm

    It’s because that is exactly what they’re implying. Genuinely horrific. The preteens are eating it up and claiming he wasn’t raped or assaulted because he said that he consented. As if he wasn’t yelling for him to stop multiple times. Trash ass writing.