Blatantly denying the resemblance w ur own eyes. First of all, pointing out resemblance is NOT accusing plagiarism so idk why ur playing defense. I’m don’t this is even something to hate on the creator for either, just a physical observation being pointed out.
Doe blue eyes, same hair as gojo + thin eyes & tied up black hair like geto. It’s not hard to see a resemblance. they literally just look like the two but in another art style. If you’re still in denial well I can’t help someone who’s willingly blind! Bye
Uhm... calm down ? Like it's not deep, why are you overreacting? It's js icky
why are you so defensive over my opinion lmao ? If I don't see the resemblance then I don't see it. We (normal humans) call this an "opinion".
You're acting like I insulted your grandma, please I am genuinely embarrassed for you.
And these characters look nowhere close to Gojo and Geto. You're basically saying that: all the characters with white hair and blue eyes x all the characters with thin eyes and tied up black hair are Gojo x Geto. Mind you this type of design existed way before jjk...
Anyway girl, I don't have the energy for this one so if you think they look alike then go, girl ! go ! But don't put your bullshit one me js bc I I don't share your opinion or I don't see the shit you're seeing.
I'll just erase this interaction from my memory, bye bye, hope to never interact with you again! xx
points out similarities —> proceeds deny similarities despite acknowledging them
1. “Doe blue eyes, same hair as gojo + thin eyes & tied up black hair like geto. It’s not hard to see a resemblance. they literally just look like the two but in another art style.” =/= “all characters with these traits are satosugu copies” or any implication that Gojo and Geto are the OG of any kind
the ONLY simple observation made is: these 2 characters look like Gojo and Geto.
2. “why are you so defensive over my opinion lmao ? If I don't see the resemblance then I don't see it. We (normal humans) call this an "opinion” —> defensive because I personally think your take is so unbelievable, similar to rage bait.
Analogy: if I have a bowl of spaghetti and a bowl of ramen, I might say “that ramen looks like spaghetti!” I’m not saying “Ramen ARE spaghetti” just that they look alike. What’s you’re doing is outright saying “no, they don’t look alike AT ALL.”
Please. Come on
Stop embarrassing yourself please, it's genuinely icky. If I don't see it then I don't see it, you can't force your opinion on others, hope you understand that. Characters having the same colors palette doesn't mean they look alike. TO ME (key-word 'me') I don't see the resemblance and it's fine, it's not going to change anything in your life.
You personally think it's unbelievable ? Flash news, I don't care about what YOU think. Do you have comprehension issues ? Reading issues ? being all aggressive because I don't see the shit you're seeing ? Oh b it stinks really bad.
don't force your opinion on others just because they don't agree with you, it's a nasty behavior.
“I don’t see the resemblance” implies there’s no resemblance at all and that’s factually untrue???
I understand it’s your opinion, I’m trying to show you your opinion is NOT SUBSTANTIAL because it’s not backed up by the **physical evidence in front of us**
Forcing my opinion implied coercion or some sort of iron fisting but what I’m doing is pointing at evidence —> making a claim based off evidence —> then pointing out how ur claim is NOT backed up by the evidence
Mind you I’m NOT saying: “theyre a 1 TO 1 to satosugu” but that there IS a resemblance of SOME capacity
Making a comparison is a basic analysis trait and if you compare and contrast the characters with satosugu, you can see there’s at least SOME physical similarities
If u deny physical proof right in front of you, then I’m more sad for you than anything else. Because imagine if this were any other context: a political topic (ESPECIALLY), social issues, scientific studies etc, then this is not a good way to conduct your way of thinking.
I hope when you interact with others in the future, you can at the very least come up with rebuttals that match what the other person is saying rather than resorting to just “you’re embarassing yourself!” “I’m embarrassed for you!!” or “it’s just my opinion!” Especially AGAIN when the opinion is not supported by the evidence
TLDR; make sure evidence supports ur opinions
Okay, are you done ? Despite all your blabla, I still don't see the resemblance :) I repeat again: I don't see the RESEMBLANCE. Key-word "I" it's means that it's MY opinion. You don't have to agree with me, it's okay.
Want me to spell it for you ? I D O N O T S E E T H E R E S E M B L A N C E
Want me to say it in French ? Je ne vois pas la ressemblance. :)
I am trying to be as nice as possible but you're not helping. Imagine being mad about someone else having a different opinion than you. Wild, right ?
When I interacted with others, I hear them out, understand their opinions and move on. I don't spend my time on forcing my delusions on them.
I hear, I understand you but I don't agree with you yet you're here bitching under my comment because I don't see your shit you're seeing with your shitty eyes.
I am rather a rational person which doesn't seems to be your case with the way you're arguing over my personal opinion. I don't own you evidence or wtv fuck you're spitting bc this isn't as deep as you make it seem. We're just talking about characters, 2D characters. You're actually with someone with law degree so if you want argue with me then let's talk about things that means something. Like the war in Iran, the genocide in Congo, the ban of homosexuality in Senegal, the child trafficking in Thailand. This is the kind of topic I put my energy in, this is these kind of topics that need evidence, sources, proofs. Not fucking 2D characters looking alike.
Repeat after me: this is NOT deep. This is just FICTION. It's okay if people don't share the same opinions as ME. Repeat it every days when you wake up I assure you your life will be better :) I hope this is the LAST time I am talking with you I assure you that my next replies will be the nastiest you ever read.
Sur ce, au revoir et à jamais.
Oh thank you! You're finally not as stupid as I thought. It might be complicated but there's a chance for you to understand that people don't have to share the same opinion and that you don't need to force your opinion on others.
Anyway take your unwanted bullshit and embarrassing self and go fuck your delusional ass.
I am petty so have the worse day of your life. Or the worse month of your life. Or year because idiot like you deserve it. Byeeeee :)
Being petty doesn't stop you from being rational but I guess dumbass like you can't understand that. I pity, sincerely. :(
are you bored ? Don't you have friends to talk with ? Probably bitchless, brainless and friendless huh ? Poor you :( you should have told me this sooner, I have a lot of time rn I can keep you company :(
Wishing me to “have the worse day of your life. Or the worse month of your life. Or year” Does not correlate with being “rational” and is a overreaction especially considering u urself said “ this is NOT deep”
To clarify since I think you’d need it: I’m not saying u shouldn’t overreact, I’m saying it’s hypocritical that you do overreact because you’re implying in the same breath that this is not something worth overreacting over
Also I never said you “owe me evidence” or anything of that sort. We have the evidence. the evidence is the comic itself. And I was pointing out our differing conclusions based off the evidence/the comic.
Throughout our whole conversation I take direct quotes from you, address them, broke down my thought process, and even provided an analogy. You’ve done none of these.
You resorted to calling me a dumbass, saying you’re embarrassed for me multiple, and implied me as not being a “normal human” —> all personal attacks. You can read back to our whole conversation and not once have I did any of those things.
But in conversations like this I’m not really concerned w the personal attacks themselves but is this:
You are not engaging with this discussion productively.
I said “political issues” and didn’t bring up any specific isssues purposely because it was vague and I didn’t want to distract from the main point of the conversation.
But you proceeded to do that yourself “ war in Iran, the genocide in Congo, the ban of homosexuality in Senegal, the child trafficking in Thailand.” —> to clarify I’m not saying u shouldn’t care about these things I’m saying it was unnecessary to bring up because it distracts from our initial conversation. My point here stands with you bringing up some French stuff too.
And I will repeat this because I do in fact agree with this and how it pertains with the initial disagreement regarding the physical comparison; this is NOT deep. This is just FICTION. It's okay if people don't share the same opinions as ME.
And I realized writing this, the whole time I’ve been again, Directly addressing quotes u wrote and trying to explain my thoughts but you’ve not done the same. Not once have you broke down your thought process and tried to help me see your prospective. Instead you deny mine. Demean my, and put urself on a pedestal by bringing up irrelevant things. I hope that makes it clear the difference between us.
I think u should reevaluate how u conduct urself in this convo especially having ur law degree in mind.
Admittedly my first comment “girl u know damnnn well” was condescending and I meant for it to be. But the majority of my responses were written matter of factly. If you read it another way, then it’s a misunderstanding.
And in my life I’m surrounded my amazing friends and family, financially stable, and passionate about same political issues as you. My point is I’m more sad for you than sad for myself in any capacity
Okay this will be the last time I reply to you. If you had at least a quarter of comprehension skill, you would have understood what I was saying.
Girl, you're using big words yet you don't make any sense. Like I understand where you're coming from but I don't agree with you. Can you understand that ?
I don't see what you see. To me, they don't look like Gojo and Geto. If you think they look alike, okay that's fine, it's your opinion, I respect that. Easy, right ? I heard you out and I respect your opinion but I don't agree with you. Is it complicated to understand that ?
I am not trying to distract you or wtv agit you're pulling from your ass. I am saying: I don't agree with you.
You're sad for me ? Okay. It's okay but I don't need your concern, I was raised by beautiful and kind parents, I have two best friends who cherish me and I have loving siblings so put your pity in your ass. Okay ?
Being petty doesn't stop me from being rational. I get everything you're saying but I simply don't agree with you. My degree allows me to hear and understand you but I don't have to share your views. That's how life works. I am not in the wrong. My behavior is a reaction to yours. You're truly annoying.
If you want me to engage productively with you then let's talk about things that matters. Gojo/Geto look alike don't.
I am overreacting because you're forcing your opinions on me. I don't have to agree with you. I don't have to see what you're seeing. We share different opinions and it's alright. I accept yours even if I don't agree with it and I hope you'll accept mine even if you don't agree with me and move on. That's how we live in society.
Anyway, hope this is really the last time I have to reply to you. You don't have to respond, keep your analysis to yourself and move on. You won't change my mind, I still don't see the resemblance.
I admit my nasty attitude, I shouldn't have attacked you personally but you're sincerely irritating.
Thank you very much.
NB: I don't see the resemblance and I'll never see it because to me they don't look alike. Especially the black haired character. He is far from looking like Geto.
You can disregard my last comment, I didn’t press the + button and only saw the first paragraph.
“Girl, you're using big words yet you don't make any sense” —> if you’re confused by any words I’m using u can ask me yknow. Based off you later typing “ I am overreacting because you're forcing your opinions on me.” I assume the phrase you’re confused by is “iron fisting” —> when I used this terminology I was referencing phrase “ruling with an iron fist”.
“I am not trying to distract you or wtv” —> then just like how u perceived me to be annoying, then this what I perceived you to be doing when unnecessarily speaking French outta no where. We can agree to disagree here
“ I heard you out and I respect your opinion” —> at no point I never felt respected especially when you continuously directed personal attacks at me (some u admitted to doing as well). If u can point to a specific point where you displayed respect to me then I will happily backtrack on this point and I mean this genuinely. Even still now you still do personal attacks like “ You're truly annoying.” & “ but you're sincerely irritating.” When the majority of what I’ve been doing is:
[insert quote] —> [response]
If you’d like to go into more specifics of what I’m doing is annoying you, you may. But since your statement is vague, I’m led to assume it’s because of the format I’m addressing you. And if that is the case, (emphasis on “if), then I think u should think why it irritated u that I’m directly addressing the things u say
“I am overreacting because you're forcing your opinions on me.“ —> I’ve already explained how I’m not forcing my opinion on you. Excerpt from before: “ Forcing my opinion implied coercion or some sort of iron fisting but what I’m doing is pointing at evidence —> making a claim based off evidence —> then pointing out how ur claim is NOT backed up by the evidence”
“ If you want me to engage productively with you then let's talk about things that matters. ” —> you’re implying productively should be exclusive to only “things that matter”. The unproductive things I was referring to was personal attacks, ignoring details and simulates easily observable, and not bringing up things that direct way far from the focal point. I think these are basic things that should be expected in a normal interaction. I guess my main point here is why exclude your productivity to only “things that matter” when u should strive to do that as much as you can. I think that’s ironically, unproductive.
“I admit my nasty attitude, I shouldn't have attacked you personally but you're sincerely irritating.“ —> ignoring the irony, I appreciate your acknowledgement. I’ll reacknowledge my attitude from the beginning here as well to make our mutual feelings more clear.
I’ll leave u with this: https://pin.it/5lcZdyD6C
I had trouble posting pics on mangago.me so I gave up on directly showing a comparison then but looking back, I should’ve done it thru a Pinterest pin.
Also writing this I realized I probably could’ve found a better pic for suguru when he had the same hairdo and where u can see his light brown eyes more clearly.
Also this definitely feels like a genshin skin color comparison cause the other guy is def not tan, by my standards at least.

Ppl be talking about gojo or geto but I don't even see the resemblance???