Did you not read the first line? “If he died and was revived, that’s murder”… if someone kills you and is facing you while you die, you know who killed you. That’s pretty damning evidence because the brain LITERALLY holds onto every piece of information from any point in time it thought it was going to die because that’s what is supposed to flash before your eyes the next time so that you can survive once more. I’ve known people who technically died (heartbeat gone, not breathing) and were revived and they remember everything leading up to the death vividly. My own dad died once and he said he even had an out of body experience where it felt like he was watching it happen in 3rd person. The dude LITERALLY would have seen his own killer and loved to tell the tale about it and because he DIED, that’s murder. Doesn’t matter if he was revived or not. He was dead. Deathbed confessions and deathbed utterings are admissible in court so if you died saying someone’s name, that’s evidence. Even better if you can tell the story as if replaying it for the judge and jury to hear so that they can convict her. It’s happened before and will happen again.

If he died and was revived, that’s murder. He KNEW who killed him. Why did his police friend not arrest both his ex and the dude for the murder? First degree murder and attempted life insurance fraud, AND assault and battery. I just don’t get it. All of that could have been avoided and her child would have been removed from her care and placed in the foster system from the beginning.