the author DID start with coercion in the first five chapters btw
Nit rape is it?
bruh su-ah was literally always portrayed as someone with an extreme unhealthy obsession with juhyeok, mind you he always had the problem of not taking 'no' as an answer, all their sexual encounters before the blatant rape have been coercion and dubious at best. Even after all that if people thought su-ah was a green flag and an uwu cutie seme and not a manipulative self-centered bastard then the author is not the one that should be blamed but the readers who seem to have reading comprehensions worse than a 12 yr old.
Literallyyyy
It was so like omg the author is just really good at framing suah to be a silly lighthearted character. I call that Greenwashing- where authors frame the characters as green flags and do such a good job that when you turn your brain on you feel completely tricked. I should've left early on cos even I was bamboozled into thinking it was salvageable in the early chapters. The author set it up to be mild, I had absolutely no clue what I was in for. This story is psychological horror to juhyeok and the more aware women out here but it's romance to suah and those who read with their brains off. Eeeeeyuuuchkkkk!!!
I'm sorry but if you think obsession, stalking, and scenting without consent is light hearted or "mild" as you say, and not literal criminal behavior I think the problem is on you + you shouldn't blame people who like this story, please remember it's fiction and everyone has different opinions and tolerance to toxic media just because you don't like it doesn't mean others should be shamed for liking it. Please grow up.
Where da hell you get dat from??? I said it was FRAMED in a mild way?? I only realised when I thought deeper about what I was consuming plus I'm talking about before the scenting thing was explored in depth. My point is just the way his character is portrayed by the author, not his actual chatacter. Plus my point about stupid people is the same as your point on why I'm the problem. Read whatever you want but if you find suahs behavior to be normal that's stupid. Now I feel attacked cos where the hell did u get any of that from
Oh lmao it seems I misunderstood tbh I think everyone has different views on su-ah's character personally I wouldn't call him greenwashed. The author actually did a pretty good job in framing him as a manipulative person who knows how to use tears to his own advantage (imo). To me his behavior was always transparent and su-ah's biggest flaw is that he can't take 'no' as an answer, and anyone with that inability is most of the time a rapist but I guess other people could've had been fooled if they were reading without critically analysing his behavior if they thought it was just a cute no depth manhwa.
I feel like it wasnt intentional on the authors part, I think the author is genuinely just wielding his tears to try make ppl forget he's a jackass. I js get the subtle feeling the authors pretending he's a good person, it's weird to notice but be unable to specifically point out
I guess? But we are in just ch 21 like that's really not enough to tell how it's all going to unfold. The chapters are pretty short too I don't want to jump to conclusions so soon though
Ive seen way too many greenwashed mls I absolutely will be jumping to conclusions bc if people are still arguing about whether or not he's pure shit after all he's done then somethings up
Nahhh all that could have been read as conflict to get resolved as opposed to escalation to rape
Like it’s ok to have conflict and an imperfect character but rape is where the line is crossed like the story already had a rock bottom to build up from but it chose hell instead
The way the comment section wouldn't be this toxic if the author started with rape like other BL