Gng it’s not grooming </3 they literally add that they had a brotherly relationship till highschool and he looked more like a man to him than a little boy. There was never any purposely grooming lol
my guy he literally preordered him as a toddler
Lmfaooo I get your point, it’s just that you’re flinging around the word pedophile too easily. Obviously weird, yes. And yes it’s weird for the author(s) to use that trope but I personally don’t see it as pedophilia, unless the older one actually takes interest in them when the younger one is so little. In short, I don’t see it as something to freak out over :]
The bottom said 'i raised him well' kinda grooming ngl..
Yeah, I get it. It just didn’t seem like malicious grooming to me but what do I know lmfao
still grooming by definition.
It's suprisingly..not? Lmao, true it's a weird trope but he did not groom kotaro into anything, really, maybe if it was shown more that mizuki really had feelings for kid kotaro then yeah..that'll be grooming, but it was clear as day that kotaro himself was the one who liked mizuki that way when mizuki really just thought of him as some random kid that had a phase of liking him, he did NOT exploit, nor had any malicious intent towards kotaro into making him do weird shit
THANK YOU. I was feeling crazy for a sec lmfao
This looks so good but did THEY REALLY HAVE TO DO THE GROOMING TROPE??? why must you ADD PEDOPHILLIA??