okay theres no debate that hes not exactly the greenest ml, but its just the fact that ppl treat jk as like next level trash toxic ml (even being called a "black flag") yet ppl tolerate mls from champagne and roses, painter of the night, and many more popular bls I can think of
Ty for replying respectfully.
The thing is that, yes, theres much worse out there but too many people that use that fact to defend jk is whats wrong. Yes theres absolutely worse ml's than jk, but that doesnt invalidate the fact jk is a horrible person and a massive red flag. And some people even throw in the "then why read it if you dont like rape", its a public media with the right to be criticized i dont understand why its wrong to call out the author and people defending the literal fetishization of rape.
Yess, questionable stuff is def okay to be called out, but I just wish ppl apply criticism proportionately to how worse the character actually is. But like that's kinda subjective and ppl can hate or criticize characters however they like haha. so thats js my personal opinion also.
I dont typically comment on stuff but i feel like its important to note that yes kim dan made a contract with jk but that doesnt mean you should not ask every time, you can consent to sex and that consent can be revoked at all times. In multiple ocassions kd revoked his consent to be touched saying he did not want to and jk didnt care. Its not just bc jk was "mean during sex" its because kd revoked his consent and jk did NOT CARE.
Even the first time jk asked for consent kd was surprised bc he had never asked before. Kd's consent was rarely ever there and the scene where hes being watched WITHOUT HIS CONSENT should be enough to make those red flags SPIKE.
Lets use our brains people.