You do realise the same people who warn people in the comments that a story fetishises rape and abuse are those warning people when a story fetishises incest, right? They are being consistent. You're the one trying to justify either rn.
I should be clearer actually. I mean that I see a lot of romanticised non consent that doesn't get talked about. People saying the sex is hot when it's full of "no, stop, wait" etc. I don't mean the really obvious violent rape, I mean the stuff that gets romanticised often.
I don't justify either tbh. I was merely calling out the hypocrisy
My above comment is in response, forgot to tag.
Ofc, they don't want to read a fictional story about a relationship [Oh no, WAIT, cuz they actually read it anyways lol] but they read that shit and more weird stuff like newspapers and nobody tell them nothing. Scandalized by manga again is hilarious as always and surprising as ever. The worst part is that they don't even know how to use "justify" in a sentence. They can't even keep fiction and reality separate, and they want to educate you on morality as if they wouldn't love reading pornography on online sites...
Y'all are super comfortable reading about rape and abuse in queer stories but cry about consensual incest. At least be consistent in your anger