They are a very interesting bunch they will make excuses for rapist jo continuing sex with someone unconscious then will turn back accusing tj being rapist cause ian told 'its hurts' tj said but 'you like it this way 'to which ian did not respond instead looked annoyed at being called out and few seconds later he said he gonna come. When it comes to verbal consent every instance tj said no followed by tj checking in with ian throughout and asking if ian really wants him to stop to which ian blushes but same can not be told for rapist jo cause ian told him ,he wanted rough ONCE and he took that as permission to REPEATEDLY ignore ian when he asked him to slow down or break idk why they act like tjian isn't in a decades long relationship so it's normal to push each other boundaries when it comes to pain /overstimulation etc .
Yk what always gets me? I always see them Jo Stan glaze him for the bare minimum and then misinterpret everything TJ do. They also failed to ever mentioned how Jo sexually assaulted Ian but you'll see them call TJ a rapist. If you call TJ toxic, I can acknowledge that but a rapist? For a fan of a rapist to label TJ as a rapist when he isn't...You'll barely ever see a Jo stan with reading comprehension.