It is actually still SA unfortunately. but you’re right, dohu was fully sober and consenting, or at least he wasnt about to complain about it when it happened or even after the act. We as readers know their situation and the context, and since we love them both and know that the story is such that they do actually love each other, we try to rationalise the actions in between as a lovers spat or toxic behaviour, etc. but the fact of the matter doesnt change just because we feel otherwise or that dohu himself rationalized juheyon’s actions as “necessary” in order to get through him. idk if im doing a good job explaining this. kind of like how victims of DV stay in those relationships because they “love each other” and its not that their partner actually meant to “hurt them”, but that is like the extreme example of what im trying to say. sorry if this doesnt make sense.
No it makes a lot of sense, i think i was also trying to rationalise it bc i love them sm gosh idek
This was not SA yall need to learn the difference between dubious consent and SA. Calling it SA diminishes the experiences of real SA survivors. This manhwa has never had an ounce of SA in it, as unsafe and unhealthy as their sex may be. Dohu himself states many times that he doesn’t care about the bleeding, and that he rather enjoys it. They’re both consenting adults, and have never said stop/no/anything along those lines during intercourse. Get a grip people
AMEN
I’m sorry if my words didn’t completely make sense or if my explanation wasn’t perfectly correct, but please try to get what i mean. also, you may want to rethink what you said about the dubious consent bit, because if we consider in real world situations, “dubious consent” is basically coercion or a legally grey area altogether which again, diminishes the experiences of actual SA survivors. if you read what I said, i acknowledge that dohu did infact have no qualms about how he was being treated, so as the audience/readers, we understand that context.
Im the first person that jumps authors for sa but this was not sa and we need to stop calling it that when there were two consenting adults… was it toxic, rough, dysfunctional, yes but sa? No