Weird to read the comments

Girlypop it's not just his face, his body looks like it belongs to a middle schooler or at the very least a freshman high school student

Same as me, I'm only 147 cm, have a baby face, and yet, I'm 29 yo this year

girl bye

Boy girl animal just admit it looks shota baited .

This and that are completely diff things hello

There name is shouta we're all being rage baited Lowkey

I'm not that low to rage baited you

Ur low enough to not consider his look shota idk how low u are.

??? I consider it that's why I typed like that? If not, I won't compare it to myself to give him some justice and even give my comment. How amusing of you to judge with lack of empathy as a human being

you guys would complain how my child-like look when I am 30 yo and dating someone who has a more mature look? It's just a face and a FICTION.



So ur telling me u consider him to look like shota and ur defending him cause he looks shota cause ur clearly saying its "just a face and fiction".

The issue with ur comment is how u wrote it.

This story does not even acknowledge he looks shota , which is funny cause it feels like the author is just fetishizing him . But in a strange shota way .


I look like a child myself and to be real with u when older people like me even i get chills and be like pedo cause half of the time they like me cause i look "young child like"


So this is coming from someone who also looks child-like.

Im not saying we cant date older people , its just strange how the author wrote it which makes it feels shota baited .

And the issue here is also you typed I rage baited you when I clearly just typed my opinion to defense the mc. Whatever writer-nim drew, the real issue here is how some commentators like to judge this kind of artwork as a pedo thing when some people also have this kind of face and kinda relate to that. I don't know the purpose of writer-nim/artist-nim but the hate comments are too much to read.

I said you rage baited cause the way u defended. And the way you made ur comment by saying it's fictional is like u saying it's fine he looks shota cause it's just art it's not real it's just fiction.

Sure you don't know the author intentions of making mc looks like a kid .

But like why defend him who obviously looks like a child with the word choices u use.

It's fiction, just a face .

I honestly thought u rage baited cause when that person replied to you , you did not acknowledge what they were saying, ur like I'm the same way , okay ur the same way but still that doesn't make mc looking like that as fine now does it?

U are able to acknowledge you look child-like .

Not once did mc ever acknowledge that , and that's author fault that's why we are judging as pedo work , it's due to how the author drew and presented this .