For the people defending this. TRY FUCKING READING The story is problematic because it leans on a very old and very obvious trope: enslaved characters with no real agency whose main narrative function is to validate the morality of a white “redeemer.” That’s why people call it a white savior framing not because slavery appears in it, but because of how power and character agency are distributed and the argument that “critics are just the same people who defend X in fiction” is just a deflection with no basis. You don’t get to lump together unrelated audiences to dodge criticism of a specific narrative choice. Disliking racist framing in a story doesn’t automatically map onto whatever unrelated debates you guys want to drag in.
It's a historical fact, a scene from a story that took place during civil war ...You are all crying over black people now having facial features when a white maid didn't have facial features too .. NOW WE ARE CRYING OVER HISTORICAL FACTS
It's a historical fact, a scene from a story that took place during civil war ...You are all crying over black people now having facial features when a white maid didn't have facial features too ..NOW WE ARE CR... Cains ultimate waifu
damn bro ur deadass so fucking ignorant u can’t even pretend to read the comment, u js saying sum bullshit every single time !
YOUR SENSITIVE ASSES RUINED IT FOR EVERYONE..RUSSIANS AND EVERYONE ELSE DIDN'T HAVE AN ISSUE ONLY YOUR PPL Cains ultimate waifu
we ain’t being sensitive bro JAXX was planning on making a painfully insensitive story and fucking owned up to it so why r u still bitching about it?? Man fuck the Russians and fuck u tooo lolololol
YOUR SENSITIVE ASSES RUINED IT FOR EVERYONE..RUSSIANS AND EVERYONE ELSE DIDN'T HAVE AN ISSUE ONLY YOUR PPL Cains ultimate waifu
"Only your people"? Well... yeah? It's a story centered around the enslavement of Black and Indigenous people. Of course the communities whose history is being depicted are going to have stronger opinions about how it's portrayed... Bitch Tf
For the people defending this. TRY FUCKING READING The story is problematic because it leans on a very old and very obvious trope: enslaved characters with no real agency whose main narrative function is to validate the morality of a white “redeemer.” That’s why people call it a white savior framing not because slavery appears in it, but because of how power and character agency are distributed and the argument that “critics are just the same people who defend X in fiction” is just a deflection with no basis. You don’t get to lump together unrelated audiences to dodge criticism of a specific narrative choice. Disliking racist framing in a story doesn’t automatically map onto whatever unrelated debates you guys want to drag in.
Use your fucking brains for once.