That hand job on the couch was dub-con at best, and didn’t the professor hire him only after he saw his crying face which he was attracted to, and yes he disclosed he was gay (not saying he has an obligation to)but, the issue isn’t him being gay it’s that he’s interested in the uke, that’s what he should have disclosed if he was going to disclose something ,but. if a 19 year girl was hired by a professor because he was interested in her, and pushed her down on the couch, saying if you want advice you have to hug me everyday and all that other obvious grooming behavior, would that still be sweet and cute? Because to me, it was creepy no matter the gender Am I the only one who thought the professor is creepy, and just because it was the uke who confessed first, doesn’t make it not bad? And you can argue the uke is an adult so it’s legal, but just because it’s technically legal doesn’t make it morally right, he 19, teen is still in his age, and grooming can be of any age
That hand job on the couch was dub-con at best, and didn’t the professor hire him only after he saw his crying face which he was attracted to, and yes he disclosed he was gay (not saying he has an obligation to)but, the issue isn’t him being gay it’s that he’s interested in the uke, that’s what he should have disclosed if he was going to disclose something ,but. if a 19 year girl was hired by a professor because he was interested in her, and pushed her down on the couch, saying if you want advice you have to hug me everyday and all that other obvious grooming behavior, would that still be sweet and cute?
Because to me, it was creepy no matter the gender
Am I the only one who thought the professor is creepy, and just because it was the uke who confessed first, doesn’t make it not bad? And you can argue the uke is an adult so it’s legal, but just because it’s technically legal doesn’t make it morally right, he 19, teen is still in his age, and grooming can be of any age