I don't understand why everybody is such a big deal about the art style. Of course it has changed!
but it's by no means ugly! ╮(￣▽￣)╭ I keep seeing people say that the bottom looks like a kid, but he really doesn't (in my opinion) he has softer features and that's always been his design. The fact that someone looks young doesn't mean that they look like a kid
so why not concentrate on the story itself? It's entirely acceptable to prefer the old art style, but there's no need to constantly criticize the artist for it. Rainbow City has an amazing plot and well-written characters, but the comments always end up focusing on the same point. There are many other things that deserve to be noticed apart from the art style. #－.－)
I don't understand why everybody is such a big deal about the art style. Of course it has changed!
but it's by no means ugly! ╮(￣▽￣)╭ I keep seeing people say that the bottom looks like a kid, but he really doesn't (in my opinion) he has softer features and that's always been his design. The fact that someone looks young doesn't mean that they look like a kid
so why not concentrate on the story itself? It's entirely acceptable to prefer the old art style, but there's no need to constantly criticize the artist for it. Rainbow City has an amazing plot and well-written characters, but the comments always end up focusing on the same point. There are many other things that deserve to be noticed apart from the art style. #－.－)