Teachers logic is flawed, yet he is too prideful to aknowledge ut. He claims comdons music isnt music , yet he says he is a musician and takes value in his ( comptons music) performance, so it IS music in the end. Because by his logic, why would a musician waste time on something that isn't music? I understand that he means "worthy/valuable" music but the logic is broken since a musician knows to appreciate all music besides personal taste
Teachers logic is flawed, yet he is too prideful to aknowledge ut. He claims comdons music isnt music , yet he says he is a musician and takes value in his ( comptons music) performance, so it IS music in the end. Because by his logic, why would a musician waste time on something that isn't music? I understand that he means "worthy/valuable" music but the logic is broken since a musician knows to appreciate all music besides personal taste