So is the story trying to explain or justify that the man is some kind of sex machine that goes for women and men and only cares for his desires and doesn't understand or REALLY ignores what consent is? Like some kind of animal answering to his instincts? Like the man doesn't know about human social interactions, morality, respect...?
So he doesn't know what he does is rape???? Because he answers to the monsters's lust or whatever?... the first time, the one in the forest, one can see that but the other times are just him being a rapist. A beast.
Such a waist of good art. Maybe it's like the red head goblin's story and gets better in the second season, not that him was better but this male lead is ugh.
So is the story trying to explain or justify that the man is some kind of sex machine that goes for women and men and only cares for his desires and doesn't understand or REALLY ignores what consent is? Like some kind of animal answering to his instincts? Like the man doesn't know about human social interactions, morality, respect...?
So he doesn't know what he does is rape???? Because he answers to the monsters's lust or whatever?... the first time, the one in the forest, one can see that but the other times are just him being a rapist. A beast.
Such a waist of good art. Maybe it's like the red head goblin's story and gets better in the second season, not that him was better but this male lead is ugh.