It's a no from me.

How did you reach that conclusion I don’t know if yk but ppl are widely using ai as a search engine. Just because it’s a part of the story doesn’t mean they use AI in their art work. Can’t speak for whether they use it as a search engine or for other matters but that doesn’t implicate us, the readers. Either way, you really can’t reach that conclusion from that seriously…

Nowadays, Media literacy is a skill. Not everybody has it don’t dwell too much on people like this.

lol I’m aware but idk smts I have the urge to comment even if it won’t make much of a difference just wanted to throw it out there but I so agree

as much as i dont like that ai is starting to be included even here in smut world, it's not enough to accuse the author of using AI for their story.

With your logic, how could Omegaverse authors have illustrated or write knottings and pheromones. Jsut because they have the knowledge to it doesn't mean they partake in it. I know how to burn a house down that doesn't I'm an arsonist, am I??

Good point. It's true that that does not mean the author use it, probably that everyone around them use it and authors tend to incorporate a little bit of themselves in their stories. I am also probably very biased towards Ai, as I am directly impacted for various reason. The positive/neutral depiction kind of bugs me, but you do have a point.

Lol, I understand how off-putting it is, but i think it's more that the author is writing a realistic depiction of a college student in SK right now. It ended up being useless and didn't come up again, so I feel that's more reflective of the author's stance.

I'm fully and 100% against A.I but the fact you're saying this while reading on an illegal website is so hypocritic and funny HHAHHAHA

you literally just said that the author should kill themselves for using ai when they were probably just incorporating modern media to allude to the year this takes place in and they didn't actually use ai

Ikr!! Louder for this weirdo to hear. it's fvcking crazy that they told someone to commit suicide when they don't know if the author actually supports A.I. What's the point of having "ethics" when you believe that someone should commit suicide just bc you think they're a "horrible" person WITHOUT concrete evidence. Hypocritic much. Like contrary to you people actually have morals and is ACTUALLY anti A.I without needing to tell someone to die.

This is so dumbb