Wait... im contemplating on reading this (ive seen it around too many times over the years), so could you spoil me about the first... if you dont mind, that is?
ML (Idk if you can call him that, because this is no way a romance) kind of saved a cyborg from being a sex doll, a project lead by his uncle. This cyborg boy sex toy was a real boy, an orphan who sought help from the ML's uncle, to find a loving family who would adopt his sister who was being bullied in the school.
In exhange for finding a family for his sister, the uncle asked the boy to give up his body to become a sex doll for men.
It was also shown the boy cyborg being sexually used by several men at a time.
This is preposterous and so sad :(( im in no way a moral police but seriously???
I was called a moral police by another reader earlier when I pointed out these facts (which they didn't also contradict) for assuming I'm judging the people who like shotacons. I was just merely saying my opinion and preference. I know it's fiction and not reality, but still, I draw the line at lolicon, shotacon and romanticized rape.
I don't mind rape and noncons in my fiction, but I need them to be what they really is - a crime - and not romanticised as forgiveable, let alone acceptable actions in romantic relationships. Kinks and fetishes with consent are of course different,
PREACH, monarch/queen/king
I 1000% agree, i usually try to avoid rape like the plague tho but SAY YOUR PIECE
Also same with shota/lolicon, like WHY kid-like characters??? This was also one of the main reasons why I chose not to read the manga, bcuz the cover just didn't sit right with me
WTF is this? They made a sex cyborg out of a boy. I just watched a documentary about "bacha bazi" and reading this made me remember that.
Now, even if I read their domesticated life after, this will never look good for me. Why can't they just make their relationship father and son? This is making me sick.