What if the baby is the product of Rape, in this case it is. The Omega is the one who raped the Alpha so if the Omega is pregnant now, does it gives rights to only the omega because of omega decides to have the child but the Alpha never wanted to father any children so does he gets rights or not?
I think the case is not about which role has the most rights, but about the wellness of the one who gets pregnant, which must be a consideration or variable before making a decision to have a child or have an abortion.
But when the omega raped the Alpha, that time the consequences were not taken into consideration?
It depends but what I am trying to say is that the Alpha gets a say in the situation because the Alpha didn't consent and the Omega did rape so what happens is, if Omega decides to keep the baby then the Alpha also has the right to say I don't need the baby is what I am trying to say, so for the opposite also that if the Omega doesn't want the baby but the Alpha should get the rights here to interfere but yes ik the best interests for both the Omega who is carrying the child and the Alpha who was raped needs to be considered too.
rapist(child bearer) - victim
(the opinion i find most logical)
on accident wanna keep it - don't keep it= (legal actions to stay away from any responsibility)
on accident wanna keep it - do keep it= (compromise)
on purpose wanna keep it - don't keep it= (legal actions to stay away from any responsibility)
on purpose wanna keep it - do keep it= (compromise)
on accident don't wanna keep it - don't keep it= (compromise)
on accident don't wanna keep it - do keep it= (don't have a say in it)
on purpose don't wanna keep it (?)- don't keep it= (compromise)
on purpose don't wanna keep it (?)- do keep it= (don't have a say in it)
so no, last decision stil belongs to bearer but the victim can defend their own rights with contracts
If this is about Dane and Grayson, yes, Dane did sort of force Grayson to have sex ‘unconsciously’ (Dane was in heat, wasn’t he?). And what Flippy meant (the comment you replied to) wasn’t to belittle the rights of the person who isn’t carrying the baby, if the case involves an Alpha who was raped as you said and then asked or obliged to raise and provide for a child he doesn't want, of course it's his right to refuse. But does the Alpha have the right to say “have an abortion”? or “keep the baby”? Regardless of whether the sexual intercourse was consensual or not, it's not an ethical demand because the priority is the wellbeing of the mother and child. I mean, Grayson says, “What if I want that child?” that’s crazy, telling someone who doesn’t want a child to carry it for 9 months and then have to give birth to that baby. What if the mother is stressed? What if that affects the child? or what if the baby born in poor health? that’s what I mean by wellbeing.
ugh I meant to reply Aggrevateraid response
im with dane on this. anyone who's not gonna bear the child in their own body has like zero say in whether they want to have one or have more or want it kept or aborted. you can talk that shi with your inner voice if you're not the one who's gonna give birth ¯_(ツ)_/¯