I’ve been trying to wrap my head around that part and I just don’t feel like it’d Make sense for Walter to actually try to double suicide. If you look at UGH Walter’s character is very straightforward and he doesn’t seem like the type to do something crazy like that. It just wouldn’t make any sense for him to pull a double suicide which is like a “If I can’t hbe you no one can, but I can’t live without you” move and that doesn’t seem like him at all. He doesn’t seem to have the same kind of possessiveness that Sword had though he did care about Norman to a degree. I thought maybe he pulled that move as a way to let Norman move on without having to actually dump him, so his heart wouldn’t be broken like Sword did? But.... I don’t know the whole thing makes no sense. What would make more sense though is if Norman was the one who had poisoned the champagne and killed Walter, and that’s why he knew what was in it and that’s why it was his first failed attempt? Though over all I think the author left out a lot of details about that relationship that would’ve been nice. I think I’m not as into these sequels because I don’t particularly catenary for Norman? Like I feel bad for him to an extent but also... I don’t feel much attachment to his character. Plus Erie’s ending is just..... :////
I’ve been trying to wrap my head around that part and I just don’t feel like it’d Make sense for Walter to actually try to double suicide. If you look at UGH Walter’s character is very straightforward and he doesn’t seem like the type to do something crazy like that. It just wouldn’t make any sense for him to pull a double suicide which is like a “If I can’t hbe you no one can, but I can’t live without you” move and that doesn’t seem like him at all. He doesn’t seem to have the same kind of possessiveness that Sword had though he did care about Norman to a degree. I thought maybe he pulled that move as a way to let Norman move on without having to actually dump him, so his heart wouldn’t be broken like Sword did? But.... I don’t know the whole thing makes no sense. What would make more sense though is if Norman was the one who had poisoned the champagne and killed Walter, and that’s why he knew what was in it and that’s why it was his first failed attempt? Though over all I think the author left out a lot of details about that relationship that would’ve been nice. I think I’m not as into these sequels because I don’t particularly catenary for Norman? Like I feel bad for him to an extent but also... I don’t feel much attachment to his character. Plus Erie’s ending is just..... :////