What if the blondie isn't so bad? Seunghee is 18, so I don't think in this age it can be called pedophilia (In my opinion, pedophila is when an adult tries to jump on a kid, not a minor or a teenager) besides, Seunghee also wanted to have something with blondie, but blondie refused, saying it's too early or something like that. Would pedophile really do this? After grooming his "prey" would he just say "no", when the prey wants to have something? And about the D-picture we probably saw... His boss has the password and username to his account, and his boss seems to dislike the idea that he is just seeing younger boys so much. So what if the boss is sending pictures of his own D in blondie's account so he would chase away potentional "friends"? Okay, it doesn't make much sence after I wrote it, but still, he has the key to blondie's account and he probably can do anything with it. Including sending pictures and writting messages.
no, hes a pedophile. sunghee is described as babyfaced, he may be 18 but hes not fully developed, and he definitely still has the mentality of a kid. if you pay attention, it's stated multiple times that blondie IS a pedophile. its mentioned that he likes sunghees school uniform- a visual reminder than he is a minor. its implied that once sunghee grows and fully becomes an adult he'll be tossed aside, and even without the dickpic incident, hes clearly met and taken interest in young boys many times prior.
and the dickpic being hacked seems unlikely. the boss is characterized as someone with a pretty strict sense of morals. if he wanted to chase away potential victims, he would (and is! as shown with sunghee) take another, more legal route.
The thing about the boss might be true! Nice one! But he also did harass seungtaek, another 17yo, in the car... Seunghee actual age is 17. Koreans measure it with another way. As for the " he isn't a pedophile" i would like to ask you, do you believe someone who is constantly praying 13yos should be stoped or not? According to science they aren't pedophiles, tho the law does not seem to use other terms. The blondie was in a site that according to seunghee was for adults to find teenagers. And of course a pedophile would say "no". Seunghee was not ready. Blondie hadn't lay the trap well enough at that time. He took his precious time before he even answered. Seunghee could afterwards report it and it is a crime in korea.
Lol. We've had a similar argument as to this one and I think the closest one we can classify Blondie is predator/opportunistic (credits to @youraedthiswrogn) and a sexual harraser in Sungtaek's cases. Pedophiles target prepubescent (13 or below). In this manga, we cannot identify the age range of these targeted minors.
Lol. We've had a similar argument as to this one and I think the closest one we can classify Blondie is predator/opportunistic (credits to @youraedthiswrogn) and a sexual harraser in Sungtaek's cases. Pedophile... Daisukisports
I think that based in Article 17 of Child Welfare Act what blondie did to seungtaek in the csr is not sexual harassment but could pass for ....(i wont say the word because i feel that you wont like it)....philia in a south korean court.
I think that based in Article 17 of Child Welfare Act what blondie did to seungtaek in the csr is not sexual harassment but could pass for ....(i wont say the word because i feel that you wont like it)....phili... _read_everythingdamn-it
What if the blondie isn't so bad? Seunghee is 18, so I don't think in this age it can be called pedophilia (In my opinion, pedophila is when an adult tries to jump on a kid, not a minor or a teenager) besides, Seunghee also wanted to have something with blondie, but blondie refused, saying it's too early or something like that. Would pedophile really do this? After grooming his "prey" would he just say "no", when the prey wants to have something?
And about the D-picture we probably saw... His boss has the password and username to his account, and his boss seems to dislike the idea that he is just seeing younger boys so much. So what if the boss is sending pictures of his own D in blondie's account so he would chase away potentional "friends"?
Okay, it doesn't make much sence after I wrote it, but still, he has the key to blondie's account and he probably can do anything with it. Including sending pictures and writting messages.
no, hes a pedophile. sunghee is described as babyfaced, he may be 18 but hes not fully developed, and he definitely still has the mentality of a kid. if you pay attention, it's stated multiple times that blondie IS a pedophile. its mentioned that he likes sunghees school uniform- a visual reminder than he is a minor. its implied that once sunghee grows and fully becomes an adult he'll be tossed aside, and even without the dickpic incident, hes clearly met and taken interest in young boys many times prior.
and the dickpic being hacked seems unlikely. the boss is characterized as someone with a pretty strict sense of morals. if he wanted to chase away potential victims, he would (and is! as shown with sunghee) take another, more legal route.
The thing about the boss might be true! Nice one! But he also did harass seungtaek, another 17yo, in the car...
Seunghee actual age is 17. Koreans measure it with another way.
As for the " he isn't a pedophile" i would like to ask you, do you believe someone who is constantly praying 13yos should be stoped or not? According to science they aren't pedophiles, tho the law does not seem to use other terms. The blondie was in a site that according to seunghee was for adults to find teenagers.
And of course a pedophile would say "no". Seunghee was not ready. Blondie hadn't lay the trap well enough at that time. He took his precious time before he even answered. Seunghee could afterwards report it and it is a crime in korea.
Lol. We've had a similar argument as to this one and I think the closest one we can classify Blondie is predator/opportunistic (credits to @youraedthiswrogn) and a sexual harraser in Sungtaek's cases. Pedophiles target prepubescent (13 or below). In this manga, we cannot identify the age range of these targeted minors.
I think that based in Article 17 of Child Welfare Act what blondie did to seungtaek in the csr is not sexual harassment but could pass for ....(i wont say the word because i feel that you wont like it)....philia in a south korean court.
*csr is car... me and my trembling fingers....