Wish authors properly researched the disorders they add to their stories beforehand
DID and other dissociative disorders don't really work like this, it's so much more complex.. I know every system's experience is different but I've never met someone that has experienced plurality in the way this ML does like, author went full on Jekyll and Hyde with a little sprinkle of real info about the disorder thrown in there, even referencing the book twice? Jekyll and Hyde is the worst thing you could use to represent systems high-key
Does everything they do have to be perfect?? Why can't we appreciate that they very obviously tried their best? Barely any manhwas include disorders. (other than psychopathy or depression because they're super popular.) This manhwa is about romance, not about the disorder itself, so no wonder the author didn't dive into every single detail about D.I.D, they could understand it's more complex but why overcomplicate it when it's not the main plot?? They just showed the surface of D.I.D, which is reasonable considering how much excess effort it would require to go deeper into the disorder.
Wouldve been sweeter if you didn't throw an accusation that we both know is wrong at me just because we have rivaling thoughts, immature but who am I to judge
This "Vague Dream" person made it so I can't respond to their arguments, so here's my lest response to whatever they're on about: Not an accusation, just the plain truth: Saying that someone should be okay with their disorders being misrepresented and romanticized in a piece of media just because "the author tried" is sadly ableist. It seems this is just a moment of misjudgement from you and I hope you understand why it's bad to say people with disabilities should accept things like this.
If you don't have a disorder/disability that's being talked about by people that do have it, you either listen and agree or disagree in a polite manner after trying to actually understand the issue, or you keep quiet. Good luck y'all
lowkey weird that person is replying to u and arguing such a immature and narrow view. In what world should people just be okay with that and not critique at all?? And coming back with those other replies too. So immature that they can't accept that that viewpoint is ableist
lowkey weird that person is replying to u and arguing such a immature and narrow view. In what world should people just be okay with that and not critique at all?? And coming back with those other replies too. ... Guho
I didn't reply because I didn't want to argue, that hard to undertsand such simplicity? I didn't say not to critique at all, I said to appreciate the small amount of what was provided. I accepted the authors viewpoint being abliest, why I didn't reply is because the op was being passive aggressive to me and throwing accusations at me without explaining so what did you want me to do? You're the only immature one.
This "Vague Dream" person made it so I can't respond to their arguments, so here's my lest response to whatever they're on about:Not an accusation, just the plain truth: Saying that someone should be okay with ... sadist
I just came back to read this all, and I quite agree with what you just said - Other one is just being idiotic now, stealing my words and thinking they're smart ... lol
lowkey weird that person is replying to u and arguing such a immature and narrow view. In what world should people just be okay with that and not critique at all?? And coming back with those other replies too. ... Guho
nvm I misread what you said, thought you said, "lwk weird that person isn't replying to u" either way ur still annoying asl for including yourself in a debate that's been long done
Wish authors properly researched the disorders they add to their stories beforehand
DID and other dissociative disorders don't really work like this, it's so much more complex..
I know every system's experience is different but I've never met someone that has experienced plurality in the way this ML does like, author went full on Jekyll and Hyde with a little sprinkle of real info about the disorder thrown in there, even referencing the book twice? Jekyll and Hyde is the worst thing you could use to represent systems high-key
(Saying all this as a fellow system)
Does everything they do have to be perfect?? Why can't we appreciate that they very obviously tried their best? Barely any manhwas include disorders. (other than psychopathy or depression because they're super popular.) This manhwa is about romance, not about the disorder itself, so no wonder the author didn't dive into every single detail about D.I.D, they could understand it's more complex but why overcomplicate it when it's not the main plot?? They just showed the surface of D.I.D, which is reasonable considering how much excess effort it would require to go deeper into the disorder.
I NEED TO STOP PICKING FIGHTS WITH EVERYONE OH LORDD.
Pretend you didnt see the reply above, its a bad habit.
I'll be pretending I didn't see that reply because you're so misinformed and speaking from a ableist point of view. Have a great day.
You too !! ლ(´ڡ`ლ)
Wouldve been sweeter if you didn't throw an accusation that we both know is wrong at me just because we have rivaling thoughts, immature but who am I to judge
This "Vague Dream" person made it so I can't respond to their arguments, so here's my lest response to whatever they're on about:
Not an accusation, just the plain truth: Saying that someone should be okay with their disorders being misrepresented and romanticized in a piece of media just because "the author tried" is sadly ableist. It seems this is just a moment of misjudgement from you and I hope you understand why it's bad to say people with disabilities should accept things like this.
If you don't have a disorder/disability that's being talked about by people that do have it, you either listen and agree or disagree in a polite manner after trying to actually understand the issue, or you keep quiet. Good luck y'all
lowkey weird that person is replying to u and arguing such a immature and narrow view. In what world should people just be okay with that and not critique at all?? And coming back with those other replies too. So immature that they can't accept that that viewpoint is ableist
I didn't reply because I didn't want to argue, that hard to undertsand such simplicity? I didn't say not to critique at all, I said to appreciate the small amount of what was provided. I accepted the authors viewpoint being abliest, why I didn't reply is because the op was being passive aggressive to me and throwing accusations at me without explaining so what did you want me to do? You're the only immature one.
I just came back to read this all, and I quite agree with what you just said - Other one is just being idiotic now, stealing my words and thinking they're smart ... lol
nvm I misread what you said, thought you said, "lwk weird that person isn't replying to u" either way ur still annoying asl for including yourself in a debate that's been long done