2BsofaPerson-LoverFrontBack's Topics (280)

I'm going to hold your vibes when I say this. But I don't think that the dog turning into a human & ending up having a boy crush on her will ever be a real ethical issue that you need to fight over on the internet. It's not even remotely going to be a problem you ever have to deal with irl, so getting this wound up about it is kind of silly. Please just read things that you like instead of pissing yourself off.

You can ignore this tho?

You must be fine fucking a mentally dog person then

I have to ask... why are YOU thinking about it? I'm not the one who is thinking about this, YOU are. YOU are thinking of fucking the dog -- don't project your weirdness onto me, I'm literate & am completely aware that Coco has NO INTEREST in ANYONE'S AFFECTION except CHLOE'S. Stop thinking about people fucking dogs. It is not as big of a problem as you're trying to make it be

Wtf made u come up with that thought? Are u ok in the mind? It's a freaking cute story about a puppy becoming a freaking KID and the thought that comes to mind is that shit!? Just ignore the story and it would have been best if you would have shut that garbage mouth of yours. "Fucking a mentally dog person" only mental people would think of that shit and it looks to me like you are one

It's also mentioned that coco might be a spirit beast back when she was still a puppy. So i think it's just the same sense as magical dragon transforming into a human and having a love interest. If look at that by your point then those genres with magical dragons or beast who can transform into human and vice versa is disgusting.

Huh? Most of those mythical or spiritual beings aren't comparable to ordinary animals tho. They're usually portrayed as sapient, humanlike entities from the start. Their species might be different, but they're clearly people in terms of how they think and behave. Coco wasn't introduced that way. She was introduced as a literal stray dog that Chloe found and cared for. That's the identity and relationship the audience was given first So saying "she might be a spirit beast" doesn't suddenly make her equivalent to a dragon or some other already-sapient mythical being. That's the author's later justification for why she can be treated as a human character and potentially have a romantic relationship with the blond boy. That's why your comparison doesn't really work. The issue is how Coco was originally portrayed, not simply whether a non-human character can eventually become human.

the way nsfw isn't even mentioned in here why tf are they saying that. what a weird ass person omg

Idk what went through their fucking mind to come up with that shitty idea.. no one even mentioned anything inappropriate until this retard showed up. Plus I think it's pretty clear that the KID is the one with the crush and not coco.. mind u a KID who doesn't know anything about coco

I think this guy meant something differently. He was talking about how the author kind of lost the plot because this was supposed to be Chloe and Coco, yet the kid kept appearing and somehow steals the supposed moments between the main characters. And well, Coco is a dog so it's natural she doesn't understand much of human bonds, so maybe some scenes do feel a bit forced. Anyways, I think he's just angry about the implied scenes of the kid being a romantic interest for mc.

But bro you could have worded this better

Anyways, I just noticed this because I saw Lord of Mysteries being mentioned
: )

I think the issue here was about the author who wrote implying things. They could have written the story with pure friendship instead of making the boy always blush around her (having one-sided crush).

no no the the original comment was yoddeling about how inappropriate it is for coco to have love interest. they were imagining horrible things over such a cute story. thats what it is.

mf read this for free and decide to bitch about everything. why would you make something so cute to be SO WEIRD over your OWN imagination? get lost fucker.

I don't know but I don't like our mc to have a love interest either, thoough I know she would because that boy has been given a significant amount of appearances in the story. Usually, it ends up that way when a certain male character kept popping on almost every chapters, there's a high possibility they will become the ml. And I think what the original comment was talking about is that Coco was once a dog. I mean, that was my impression too so it's hard to put that away. I see Coco as a dog given a human shell. But who knows, that's just my feelings and opinions, though I must say, the original comment was indeed a bit crude when they expressed it. Tbh it was kind of disappointing for the author if they do that, but again, that's just on me. This was supposed to be a healing story between a dog and her owner, so yeah...

But if this guy didn't like it, he could have just dropped it haha.

Notice how he won't even respond to us either?? He freaking knows what he meant and won't try to argue back. And the person defending them isn't even thinking right either.. he brought up with an inappropriate thought and they're just ignoring it like it didn't happen

Um, sorry but I think y'all are missing lots of points. No matter how much I read into this, I can't see where they mentioned nsfw stuff. Or maybe my interpretation is different. And just so you know, I'm thinking fine. The commenter had made a lot of points you all didn't even read and kept attacking one single phrase. Because if you actually look into it instead of being blinded by its superficial meaning, what 2Bs guy was talking about was the author, he hated the implications of romance between Coco and the kid. They even explained a lot but it's clear you didn't read it. His issue was the author, I repeat. So when Alf replied to this comment, he interpreted this as "so you must be fine reading a dog-human romance" or something along these lines. You all are so pressed about one thing he said and didn't even read a single word that he wrote. You took it literally instead of thinking, why did he say these words? There was nothing inappropriate I'm seeing, rather his problem was with the author's way of writing.

Again, I'm thinking fine. And maybe the reason he's not explaining anything is because he didn't need to. All you needed was to read what he wrote and understand it, or maybe he has a life, so let's not expect it when people don't reply immediately.

im crine this is such a non issue dont like dont read brochacho dont drag my goat susie into this LMFAOOO

Free lawyer

Wow, this comment section got extremely impressive

touch some grass hun, you need that

No, we all read it and our point still stands this will never be a problem in real life so the fact that you guys are writing literal novels in the comment section about it is weird. And at the end of the day, she is now in a human body she doesn’t think like a dog if she did, there would be no story. And as far as I know that little boy doesn’t even know that she was a dog none of them do. So this moral issue that you guys are writing so hard for literally is nonexistent. Oh but the implications of the author, the author chose to do that. OK and?? writing things that you find morally gray does not hurt you or reality. I literally encouraged you guys to see a therapist and touch grass.

Lowkeynuinely agree with this one. Author should've gone for the friendship route instead of making the boy have a one-sided crush

The reason coco got involved with the ml is because she wants to save Chloe,, till now the plot is literally about coco saving Chloe and every relationship she gets into is because of that bc she's mentally still a kid, the ml who was isolated and alone got saved by coco that's why he likes her it's literally completely normal and the author didn't even show coco liking the ml romantically cuz she's not thinking about it so why are you so pissed? Coco is most definitely a spirit beast so she's not a normal "animal" she's lived that way because she's still a kid, if she was an adult then maybe it would've been closer to those ml's who are actually dragons and even if they were shown to be more "human" from the beginning it's because they've already lived their childhood? Even so the ml here does not know coco is a dog he jst sees her as a girl his age, ur the weird one for mentioning fucking a dog when nothing implyed it because they're both KIIIDSSS, coco is a mystical being not a dog jst bc she wasn't born an adult dosent change the fact and the ml is gonna be a normal guy too there's nothing wrong w this

You must be fucking stupid

What???

Lmao it takes an unreasonable amount of time on the internet and reading slop manhwa to understand this I'm dying

When mcs are powering up and aura farming, their eyes glow and have those flowy glow resembling a sperm hahahaha

Is it cheating if it’s a contract marriage? Usually there’s some clauses, she was more mad that he went for a predator

I don't think he found the cheating itself beautiful. More like he saw how happy his father was to be with a predator than being with his own family. And as a kid he craved that kind of happiness which he attributed to being with predators.

So I really did read it wrong, mb mb hahaha.

Excuse me? Marriage is still marriage, no?

You’re not wrong, and I hate cheating as well especially when kids are involved. Thst makes it all the more dirty and an act of betrayal. But from ml’s perspective, it seemed like their marriage was very cold and sad and I think that person was just pointing out the fact that in a lot of contract marriages, it’s more like a business agreement than a real relationship or exchange of love so in that sense, it makes sense why the father looked so happy and smitten because he’d found someone who he actually had genuine feelings for, someone that made him smile like his own son had never seen. It’s not right, but as the other person stated, it didn’t even seem like the mother was that mad about the act of straying from the marriage in general. She seemed upset that it was with a predator. That alone tells you a lot about the state of their marriage/business arrangement.