So having someone sexually harass you can't be reported if they do not put their wee in a certain place? But the aggressor can call it "rape" even if they themselves insert someone's wee into them selves even when the actual victim says N-O?? Is that what you are saying sensei? Is this the message you want to spread to people? Also, it was the nurse that bound and inserted his fingers into the seme's anus so wouldn't that sti be considered rape/molestation?? https://www.mangago.me/read-manga/hishoshitsu_no_himitsu/mf/v01/c005.1/19/
I was disappointed of the story with the boss and the secretary, I expected much more but all we get is a slutty boss who keeps screwing other guys even tho he conquered the secretary.
I don't agree with what the uke was implying here http://www.mangago.me/read-manga/hishoshitsu_no_himitsu/mf/v01/c005.1/19/ I'm sure that men do get raped by women too. They aren't penetrated, but they are forced to perform sexual acts against their will, used and taken advantage of, which is what i thought rape was. So i think that what the uke was saying, is wrong.
Though I completely agree with your position on the definition of rape, he was merely stating that very definition as it stands from a legal perspective. In most countries, the US included, "envelopment" is not considered "rape". Rape is defined in the US as "the forcible penetration of a penis, appendage (finger or fingers, hands, feet) or other object into an orifice (mouth, ass, vagina) without consent, through restraint, coercion, violence or the use of intoxicating substances. Envelopment is only considered sexual assault, but not rape. Shitty, huh? I also think that that idea is utter lunacy. It's not exactly admirable for the uke to manipulate the law and the loophole like that, especially to blackmail someone, but women have been known to do exactly the same thing. Coming from either side (male or female), it's shitty, underhanded behaviour. You can thank NOW (National Organization for Women) for that lovely little loophole. NOW has fought for decades to prevent the definition from being changed. It's a power play for feminists. With the definition as it stands, a woman can only be a victim of rape, not the perpetrator. Unless, of course, she literally sticks her foot up a guys ass. Even then, there would be a question as to whether it was rape, since she likely would not orgasm while doing it. Feminists like to claim that there is no equality and they are right. Women have way more rights and privileges than men do. Ever heard of the "Violence Against Men Act"? No? That's because there isn't one, but there is a "Violence Against Women Act". You should Google it and read the entire act. It will shock your socks off at how men are portrayed as the only perpetrators of domestic abuse. Victims are always referred to as "she" and the perpetrator is always referred to as "he". I guess NOW believes women in domestic partnerships are incapable of violence. NOW basically wrote and spearheaded the campaign to get VAWA accepted and passed into law. VAWA was also the catalyst for how rape is defined around the world. It would be perfect if rape was defined as "any sexual act performed without consent", but NOW has fought that definition for decades because women could then be a perpetrator as well as a victim. Feminists have an agenda and it isn't always the one they claim it is.
All of them was cute! Humble hard dick Cracked me tf up Also big magnum! Hat guy they should be thank ful to him cuz he mad That boy Realize he loved aoi
Topics
So having someone sexually harass you can't be reported if they do not put their wee in a certain place? But the aggressor can call it "rape" even if they themselves insert someone's wee into them selves even when the actual victim says N-O?? Is that what you are saying sensei? Is this the message you want to spread to people? Also, it was the nurse that bound and inserted his fingers into the seme's anus so wouldn't that sti be considered rape/molestation??
https://www.mangago.me/read-manga/hishoshitsu_no_himitsu/mf/v01/c005.1/19/
Secretary deserves better. I wished the damn seme stayed a manwhore his entire life while the uke found someone he deserves.
Does anyone know the manga this little guy belongs too?
http://www.mangago.me/read-manga/hishoshitsu_no_himitsu/mf/v01/c005.1/1/
I was disappointed of the story with the boss and the secretary, I expected much more but all we get is a slutty boss who keeps screwing other guys even tho he conquered the secretary.
I don't agree with what the uke was implying here http://www.mangago.me/read-manga/hishoshitsu_no_himitsu/mf/v01/c005.1/19/
I'm sure that men do get raped by women too. They aren't penetrated, but they are forced to perform sexual acts against their will, used and taken advantage of, which is what i thought rape was. So i think that what the uke was saying, is wrong.
Though I completely agree with your position on the definition of rape, he was merely stating that very definition as it stands from a legal perspective. In most countries, the US included, "envelopment" is not considered "rape". Rape is defined in the US as "the forcible penetration of a penis, appendage (finger or fingers, hands, feet) or other object into an orifice (mouth, ass, vagina) without consent, through restraint, coercion, violence or the use of intoxicating substances. Envelopment is only considered sexual assault, but not rape. Shitty, huh? I also think that that idea is utter lunacy. It's not exactly admirable for the uke to manipulate the law and the loophole like that, especially to blackmail someone, but women have been known to do exactly the same thing. Coming from either side (male or female), it's shitty, underhanded behaviour. You can thank NOW (National Organization for Women) for that lovely little loophole. NOW has fought for decades to prevent the definition from being changed. It's a power play for feminists. With the definition as it stands, a woman can only be a victim of rape, not the perpetrator. Unless, of course, she literally sticks her foot up a guys ass. Even then, there would be a question as to whether it was rape, since she likely would not orgasm while doing it. Feminists like to claim that there is no equality and they are right. Women have way more rights and privileges than men do. Ever heard of the "Violence Against Men Act"? No? That's because there isn't one, but there is a "Violence Against Women Act". You should Google it and read the entire act. It will shock your socks off at how men are portrayed as the only perpetrators of domestic abuse. Victims are always referred to as "she" and the perpetrator is always referred to as "he". I guess NOW believes women in domestic partnerships are incapable of violence. NOW basically wrote and spearheaded the campaign to get VAWA accepted and passed into law. VAWA was also the catalyst for how rape is defined around the world. It would be perfect if rape was defined as "any sexual act performed without consent", but NOW has fought that definition for decades because women could then be a perpetrator as well as a victim. Feminists have an agenda and it isn't always the one they claim it is.
The first and last stories were the best :)
I hate the fact that the boss likes to play with other guys and intend to make the secretary fight for his love. The boss deserves hell
I agree the boss needs a taste of his own medicine
Sex scene are todo short but still love it
All of them was cute! Humble hard dick Cracked me tf up Also big magnum! Hat guy they should be thank ful to him cuz he mad That boy Realize he loved aoi
"You wanna try my big magnum..." Classic, lololol. First story for the win, the rest were so-so.
its when a man loves a man