is it heartless?

I saw in my feed that sloan posted a vid about the family of the girl who's had the Megans law named after her was suing Megahn thee stallion for referencing the law, people in the comments saw they shouldn't be mad or just deal with it, that meg gave the law publicity and spread awareness and they should be grateful, that they're just after money etc, like idk about them suing maybe they considered that since they would have more success than that of the option of having the video taken down or song changed, but it seems like no one cares to think that maybe they are sensitive to not the context but the reason it was used, even if meg used it to spread awareness and not just to make a clever pun to shade allegedly Nicki just for shadings' sake, ppl still don't stop to think about the family, I can't speak for them but personally I wouldn't be all to cool with it when I think about it(especially when the shits trendng, who even knows, maybe ppl would even bothered the family is some way[a possibility, you know how ppl always asking about the most detailed stuff ever, we may not have know what could have happened,maybe a local newspaper may have eventually bothered them for their thoughts, etc]), 30 years for me I feel wouldn't be the end of mourning my child and seeing someone seemingly using it to what may be appear to be shallow intentions wouldn't make me happy, and idk the couples reason but in this context I feel ppl are a bit mean to think that the family only wants cash and doesn't about the way their daughters likeness was used in a way.