Sorry, guys! During system maintenance, some functions like comment are unavailable.
Arguing after being proven wrong
I'm curious.
What would YOU reply to a person who said something that's based on misinformation or hearsay and supposed personal expertise~. You then correct that person with FACTUAL evidence. Yet they still keep arguing their version of reality (or delusion, tbh).
CONTEXT: (This is about art. A supposed part of the art was planned after a mistake was made, yet in an interview you can hear them talking about planning out the exact scene as is in the final. Even a staff working on the artwork has confirmed that fact.)
What would YOUR response be after previously staying nice and calm and factual?
Anything goes; meme posts, reply pics, serious answers, etc.. I'm just bored af, so gimme anything you got.
idk if you heard the term "You can't play chess with a pigeon" what ARE you supposed to say? can't argue with stupid, can't play chess with pigeons. Can't use logic with people that got no common sense. (As someone who uses more logos than pathos in arguments I hate these type of people) IT'S LIKE YOU CAN'T WIN MAN. so there isn't really a point to...... reply
