Sorry, guys! During system maintenance, some functions like comment are unavailable.
Armchair rhetoric strikes again. Realistically, if someone was in a life or death situation where they could only pick either a human or a dog, they'd pick on a variety of subconcious biases + environmental conditions... Underwhich, neither can be really faulted to the individual making the choice so... what is the point of this argument?   reply
4 hours
13 followers

question

2373 people did / 1678 want to do

All questions about this thing