If you're confused by the art, the best I can explain, as someone who uses clip studio paint, is that there is a ton of 3d models and premade brushes being used that I recognize.
There also seems to be quite poor "photobashing" for certain parts of the art, AKA using images, usually found on google and such, cutting them out, warping them / adjusting them, and using them in the art piece. Typically this is done by professional artists in character concepting, environments, etc. (You see this a lot in video game concept art) Not webcomics like this, so it is very out of place.
Certain "materials" are reused a lot, such as the peach boys eyes, which do not fit with the rest of the style, rendered with soft brushes while the surrounding art is cel-shaded and bold at times. Some of the lineart is inconsistent in weird places, noticeably on peach boy's body in some sexual scenes vs his face. This being pressure sensitive pen strokes on the hair and face, and a round, zero pressure pen used on the body, that also seems a bit jittery. Not sure why this is. Other images being used in certain parts of the art which do not match the style at all. I would not be surprised if some aspects are traced as well despite looking to fully hand-drawn.
The translation is bad, intensely so, but the story itself seems to be just as chaotic. Overall, the whole work is batshit crazy to say the least.
No, it does not look to be AI art, at least not upfront. That's not to say the artist didn't used AI to "assist" and traced over it, but I can not see any AI artifacts or traits in the art.
Overall a very poor mix of different medias. A insane storyline, and mix of styles. If anything feels "AI" it is the overall concept of the story entirely, not the visuals itself. Very very odd.
This one is definitely weird.
If you're confused by the art, the best I can explain, as someone who uses clip studio paint, is that there is a ton of 3d models and premade brushes being used that I recognize.
There also seems to be quite poor "photobashing" for certain parts of the art, AKA using images, usually found on google and such, cutting them out, warping them / adjusting them, and using them in the art piece. Typically this is done by professional artists in character concepting, environments, etc. (You see this a lot in video game concept art) Not webcomics like this, so it is very out of place.
Certain "materials" are reused a lot, such as the peach boys eyes, which do not fit with the rest of the style, rendered with soft brushes while the surrounding art is cel-shaded and bold at times. Some of the lineart is inconsistent in weird places, noticeably on peach boy's body in some sexual scenes vs his face. This being pressure sensitive pen strokes on the hair and face, and a round, zero pressure pen used on the body, that also seems a bit jittery. Not sure why this is. Other images being used in certain parts of the art which do not match the style at all. I would not be surprised if some aspects are traced as well despite looking to fully hand-drawn.
The translation is bad, intensely so, but the story itself seems to be just as chaotic. Overall, the whole work is batshit crazy to say the least.
No, it does not look to be AI art, at least not upfront. That's not to say the artist didn't used AI to "assist" and traced over it, but I can not see any AI artifacts or traits in the art.
Overall a very poor mix of different medias. A insane storyline, and mix of styles. If anything feels "AI" it is the overall concept of the story entirely, not the visuals itself. Very very odd.
At the very least, it's entertaining.