Not only does it not undermine an existing "great" character for the sake of uplifting the MC, it also recognizes the charms of how an actor is "great". We get this comparison wars ALWAYS with both awards and fan-bias, as if two actors can't stand equally great in their interpretation of a work. Of course, it doesn't remove the reality that bias is a matter of majority, hence the awards. Also, in both ways of how actors get along, adding the playwrights in their power struggle to work on a script is equally admirable <3 there's so much to learn from the author's way of layering the metascript jykell and hyde as 2 in 1 as a motif to how 2 actors or 2 playwrights are unanimous in their goal to produce a work that is both self-satisfying and impactful to the audience.
More importantly, i love MC's advice to his playwright friend about having a Hyde to prevent being taken for granted.
Not only does it not undermine an existing "great" character for the sake of uplifting the MC, it also recognizes the charms of how an actor is "great". We get this comparison wars ALWAYS with both awards and fan-bias, as if two actors can't stand equally great in their interpretation of a work. Of course, it doesn't remove the reality that bias is a matter of majority, hence the awards. Also, in both ways of how actors get along, adding the playwrights in their power struggle to work on a script is equally admirable <3 there's so much to learn from the author's way of layering the metascript jykell and hyde as 2 in 1 as a motif to how 2 actors or 2 playwrights are unanimous in their goal to produce a work that is both self-satisfying and impactful to the audience.
More importantly, i love MC's advice to his playwright friend about having a Hyde to prevent being taken for granted.