http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/yaoi-hands
LOL ... it's a thing ...
I never cared for the animation style of the OVAs. Almost like a still frame movie with awkward drawing style. Not to mention that Aki's eyes are the WRONG COLOR.
theyve been blue since the 1st manga (which is what i guess the OVA is taking as canon) but some artworks show a different colour sometimes so we're not entire sure unless sensei confirms it.
Huh, well that's disconcerting lol. I thought "fiery" hazel was the canon color. Blue always seemed weird to me.
Hazel is the canon color. The OVA is incorrect. Also, he dyes his hair. Not a natural blonde.
It's even been a thing since the days of Michelangelo. :) See number 3.
http://mentalfloss.com/article/71643/15-things-you-might-not-know-about-michelangelos-david
Tiny dick, though.
Which reminds me: Where the hell does Akihito get hair dye in that temple? He's been stuck there for months. His roots should be showing. ;)
Do you not sympathize for our dear, David?
But he was supposed to be a young man, so, perhaps he had not fully developed?
It's a shame. I wonder how many girls went for him from left to right, but later found out he had a 2-inch dick. It's also a shame that he is still a virgin. I bet tasting him is the same as tasting salt.. because for so many years, he still hasn't had sex. Oh well. I guess this is when his right hand becomes useful, right?
Motto for the day: "There is a difference between a cucumber and a rotten dick." – Moan
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Also, David is gonna be jealous in seeing this: http://i.imgur.com/n2DM8BY.png
Ummm...David supposedly had lots of children, by different women: (more than 19) including 4 boys by his wife. (he also had concubines) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sons_of_David
How did he have children when he just mastered to have the world's smallest dick?
I guess it's possible. Men still have chances.
The statue of David was carved almost 2000 years after his death. An art historian tells us why he is carved this way: "In her blog, How To Talk About Art History, she explains: ‘Firstly, they’re flaccid. If you compare their size to most flaccid male penises, they are actually not significantly smaller than real-life penises tend to be.’
But – and here’s the, erm, biggie – she also went on to explain that small penises were more prized in Ancient Greece. ‘Cultural values about male beauty were completely different back then,’ Oredsson writes.
‘Today, big penises are seen as valuable and manly, but back then, most evidence points to the fact that small penises were considered better than big ones.’
She goes on: ‘One of the reasons historians have suggested that small penises were more culturally valued is that large penises were associated with very specific characteristics: foolishness, lust and ugliness.
‘Meanwhile, the ideal Greek man was rational, intellectual and authoritative. He may still have had a lot of sex, but this was unrelated to his penis size, and his small penis allowed him to remain coolly logical.’
Wow.
You gave me a large amount of details in history--'penis history'.
Honestly, I don't get why having a large penis is something that brings foolishness.
I do agree the fact that it's ugly (Too much hair, slimy, wet and sticky. Pretty identical to an Octopus legs/arms called, tentacles.) and lusty. The hornier you get, the bigger the dick inflates. Just talking about this, gives me a huge damage to the core of my innocence. Not like I'm pure anyways.
However, I do crave a lot in knowledge. If you would like, please tell me more (⌒▽⌒)
The Greeks had a fascination with male genitalia, and made statues called Herms (the god Hermes comes from this)
https://www.google.ca/search?q=greek+herms&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj5uu_fq4LTAhWq5IMKHcnkC78QsAQINA&biw=1386&bih=734
(I took 4 years of art history LOL)
Please, this conversation started with hands. Please stick to the hands. Leave the poor male genitalia alone.
This.. is a master piece:
https://classconnection.s3.amazonaws.com/113/flashcards/5317113/jpg/artstor_103_41822000164945-1458BCD7D58252AB898.jpg
So, did you guys learn a lot about male genitalia in art history?
Uhm. I was re-watching Finder pretty late (coz' screw school)
but uhm.. did anyone notice his hands looking.. abnormally large?
Got Proof? Yes:
http://imgur.com/a/tsbBl
...
at least it doesn't look like this:
http://pm1.narvii.com/5692/16e906c93891b3b4f9b67603c90c5c797647a00f_hq.jpg