woman in menfield

You aln are so dumb
Famdom is associated to bdsm, which is a CONSENSUAL play, not abuse
You all claming "if you don't like femdom don't read this" while not even knowing what a femdom is, is hilarious

And yes, reading something make you a supporter of the thing that are normalised by the work

I don't like nazi, you will not catch me reading a book that present a nazi as a hot love interest

Same goes for abusers

You all love the "don't like don't read" only because it makes you able to enjoy abuse while acting all innocent

Plus just because "nobody bats an eyes when it's women being abused" doesn't mean we shouldn't call it out ? Fr how old are you, that's embarrassing

You both are wrong in some points tho I understand what you are trying to say but addressed in a wrong manner, take out any story manhwa/manhua/manga ppl call out to characters in that story, sympathize with victim, have not seen a single story where comment section doesn't support right, the line "women in men dominanted field" which ppl like to say now is something I seriously hate as it makes no literal sense, I mean what's with the competition in being abusers, criminals, rapists.

As for another comment just bcoz you read something doesn't make you a supporter of that particular story/author, a very immature way of thinking, ppl read it to know, understand, analyze and move on you don't like nazi so you don't read that's a good thing you chose peace but doesn't mean the best selling book with nazi content has the buyers all praying to nazis now right, ppl love to explore and that's why they read particular things.
"Don't like, don't read" is a statement for disturbing ppl who doesn't understand shit but will be the first one to criticize it's used so that others can read peacefully.
As for this story haven't read it but came to check this one out coz saw the reels one thing I know from this story is that I hate the mother, my goodness!!!
Plus after knowing that they'll have sex in ch 23 boils my blood even more fk, if ml is submissive I wish he be with fl at least.

You are so freaking dumb omfg

The point went way over your head hmm

See calling me dumb doesn't make me one but the way you comment surely makes you look like one , only two points that I mentioned were what I'm talking about that's all not about your whole ass nonsense that you've said and neither about this story. I pity that you're so dimwitted to even understand that, wasted my time over an idiot.

Pwahaha you are so ridiculous
You are acting all mighty while being absolutely unable to get what i said

There is a difference between reading/writing about abuse, and romanticizing abuse in your work/ consuming work that romanticize it

As there is a difference between reading/writing about nazis, and romanticizing them

So, you are dumb, AND you lack basic comprehension skills

Plus, the "don't like don't read" is used by people who want to peacefully read... Problematic works

There is no "don't like don't read" when it comes to calling out the romanticization of abuses/grape/racism ect

It's just a way for people to support systemic oppression without facing the consequences

And yes, you are what you read, and you are what you like
Open some books, read some articles, some studies and take some reading lessons

As I said, calling me “dumb” doesn’t magically fix your misinterpretation of what I said. No one defended the romanticization of abuse or rape—you added that yourself because it’s easier to argue with a strawman than the actual point. I already agree there’s a difference between depicting abuse and romanticizing it. That was never my argument, my point was you assuming that consuming a work that romanticizes something automatically equals endorsing it.

Criticizing harmful portrayals is valid. Equating consumption with endorsement is not. People read problematic material to critique, analyze, understand, or even enjoy it as fiction—not because they support it. This distinction matters whether you like it or not. “You are what you read” is a childish take. If that were true, anyone who studied violence, extremism or oppression would be guilty of supporting it.

“Don’t like, don’t read” exists to stop unsolicited moral policing of readers—not to silence critique. Its meant for people who clearly don’t understand the material yet are the first to criticize, it exists so others can read and engage peacefully, Stop projecting moral guilt onto readers.

So before questioning my comprehension skills, maybe work on yours, calling people dumb over and over doesn't make you correct, it just exposes how poor your media literacy is. You’re not arguing from intelligence, you’re arguing from a very obvious lack of it. I pity your dull brain.

All that to prove, once again, that you didn't understand a single word of what i said

Pretty pathetic and sad

Not agreeing with you doesn't mean not understanding you, I understood you well enough to refute your claim.