Literally, the only rule in that story that makes sense for that kind of worldbuilding is that the "strong will eat the weak." Regardless of how civil and well-dressed the human or animal-humans are, they're all monsters that will eat or be eaten by each other in the end.
I guess the point topic of this story would dwell around the question "what makes 'us' different ("human") in a world where there's no clear dileneation between 'humans' and 'animals' to the definition of monsters (greed or desire to consume)
Literally, the only rule in that story that makes sense for that kind of worldbuilding is that the "strong will eat the weak." Regardless of how civil and well-dressed the human or animal-humans are, they're all monsters that will eat or be eaten by each other in the end.
I guess the point topic of this story would dwell around the question "what makes 'us' different ("human") in a world where there's no clear dileneation between 'humans' and 'animals' to the definition of monsters (greed or desire to consume)