Absolutely revolting

*not just hugging, RUBBING against a child and thinking of how deep he wants to take it up his ass or some shit

they’re not real, do not be alarmed. this is a fictional story darling

OH, RIGHT, they're not real, that makes it, of course, so much better! Thanks for reminding me, darling, now it's totally okay. In fact, let's just draw kids being sexually assaulted, it's all fictional so it has no meaning, no real life consequences, it's all fine!!!!!!



You're a retard.

exactly!!

Another one with the braincells of a Chihuahua

if you don't like this type of content don't read it, no one is forcing you to. if this stuff makes you uncomfortable just leave, it means it's not a space meant for you. stop trying to police other people for the fiction they consume, none of it is even real

Real

This is a comment section. People comment. Ever heard of that? Again, none of you even touched on the issue, that being a CHILD, again, a fucking child is groomed and put in sexual situations multiple times and that's portrayed as something sexy and romantic. THAT'S the issue. If you had just an ounce of cognitive ability or decency, you'd understand that's sick and worth being criticized and pointed out. If you don't like criticism, don't read on a social platform with a comment section. Log off.

If you don't want to see criticisms, don't read on a site with a comment section. Log off.

somehow whenever people like you complain about problematic topics in manga you never mention that the characters and scenarios are completely fictional, because then your argument will look absolutely stupid "oh no this UNDERAGE bundle of pixels on my screen is getting abused!! well don't you worry, fictional character, i will protect you! i also lack the ability to distinguish between fictional characters (who aren't even people, they're objects used to tell a story) and real, living human beings so now I'm gonna make it everyone's problem instead of clicking off!"

Are you retarded? Depicting underage fictional characters in sexual ways that do not in any way educate or criticize (but just sexualize and fetishize) still normalizes shit that shouldn't be normalized. I truly hope you're pretending to be this retarded just to justify being a pedo/liking pedo content, but you might as well truly be that fucked in the brain... so let me put it like this - it feeds the pedo culture that's already rampant in many counties worldwide and creates a very, very dangerous image of children when they get depicted this way. If you weren't as retarded as you are, you'd understand that media has an impact and shapes mentalities, outlooks on people and topics, etc. For pedos, it gives them a free pass to enjoy content that symbolizes the worst shit that could happen to a child. One day it might be fiction, then it'll be actual CSA content.

It also says a lot about you as a person that you enjoy fictional children being in sexual situations. You know that's pedo behavior, right? If you find this in any way arousing or pleasant to look at, you're a disgusting piece of shit. Don't try and justify it in your head cause it's fictional pixels. You know exactly what those pixels represent.

PREACH! This shit is actually insane and the people defending it just cause it’s fiction!?!?!

It's almost always the same people who rate those garbage stories highly and find all the different justifications as to not question their tolerance or worse, enjoyment of kids being depicted inappropriately, so I'm guessing they have some pedo inclinations or are just plain and simple, pedos. Normal people wouldn't start arguing about fiction and pixels, so yeah.

These might be fictional but still it is unfortunately pedo shit. Hentai with little kids are also fictional and it's still child porn.

1. fiction isn't meant to educate you or decide your morals when it comes to the real world, you're supposed to do that yourself
2. you're saying that underage fictional characters being depicted in a sexual manner can change people's mentality and view on the world, but that's simply not how the brain works. if you read a story called "i raped my underage little sister" and then think that pedophilia or rape is okay, then i'm afraid you are the problem. it means you are not mature enough to be able to engage with that sort of stuff without letting it affect you. i can consume taboo topics and media without it having any influence on my real-world thoughts and emotions because i can recognize that fictional characters are. not. real. to give you a more concrete example: i am really into watersports (piss kink) in fiction. i read a lot of fanfic and manga like that, i find it hot and i get off to it. all of that is fiction. however i would genuinely rather die than engage with something like that irl, since i find piss disgusting and unappealing in real life. clear distinction between what's going on in the real world and whatever fiction you like to consume
3. "you know exactly what those pixels represent" that's just like showing someone who's allergic to cats a drawing of a cat and then they say it's bad for them. "it's just a drawing!" "yeah but a drawing of WHAT?" you just sound plain stupid and paranoid
4. also, you do know that actual pedophiles spend their time consuming porn of REAL kids, right? why would they bother with lolis or other characters. if you don't like this type of manga that's perfectly fine, but don't try to justify it by saying that the trauma and abuse REAL kids endure because of child predators is on the same level as a random fictional character (with no thoughts or feelings, therefore an object). it's extremely disrespectful to the victims

Tell me one good reason why it's fine to depict fictional children in sexual situations. One. Really think about it and tell me.

Who do you think consumes that? What and why is this consumed? What I read from your word salad is justifications after justifications after justifications. Just answer this then, let's boil it down - is it okay to depict children sexually in fiction? And - who consumes that? What for? What purpose does it serve?

You can use relativism and whataboutism all you want (the piss kink and cat examples are just so braindead, I can't), tell me why it's okay to depict children in sexual and inappropriate situations. Or rather, how depicting kids that way is the same as a piss kink (between adults who can consent), and how showing someone with a cat allergy a picture of a cat is the same as drawing children in sexual situations. I'm all ears.

Pedos consume all kinds of content, this includes both fictional and non fictional CSA.

Also, I never claimed fiction is supposed to educate, read again, idiot.

Depicting kids in sexual situations normalizes this shit and gives a gateway for people who already enjoy this stuff to delve deeper or for people with those inclinations to get into it. There are literal fictional CSA videogames. If you really think that media and depiction have no real life consequences, then you're really fucking stupid. Just reading about the industrial complex Epstein and you'd know public opinions can be influenced on a large scale by media and representation of young girls, even fashion, movies, etc. This is a large scale example, but it doesn't mean it can't work on a smaller scale. Also, in my criticism, I'm not talking about people who can differentiate, I'm talking about the *potential* of danger and vulnerable people. Are you that fucking stupid to not get that? 'But I know that's not real, I like piss in fiction, but not irl', fuck off, I like piss, too, and that's that. Piss is piss. Depicting children sexually? FUCK that. Tell me why that's okay.

Why are you defending the depiction of sexualized children so much? What are you gaining from this? The more you talk, the more suspect you seem.

Don't even come at me with the 'that's disrespectful to real victims', fuck right off, do I seem like a person who doesn't care about real victims, retard? Or do you care about the real victims so much by... Defending or being indifferent to fictional children being sexually exploited? Just listen to yourself. I'd like you to just imagine how you explain to a real CSA victim that it's actually not that big of a deal to have fictional kids in porn.

And again with the braindead assumptions, WHERE did I say fictional CSA is on the same level as real life CSA? Stupid ass fuck

it's perfectly fine to do whatever you want with fictional characters because they do not exist. they're fictional. it's just like playing with barbies: do you think that if someone makes the dolls kill each other it means they want to commit actual murder? of course not. it's the same with fictional characters. as long as you're in the right mind to recognize the clear difference between what you like in fiction an in reality you can consume whatever you want and it doesn't mean a single thing. it's not about what is "good" or "bad", fiction is the best way to explore things that may be problematic or harmful to engage with irl.

i gave the piss kink example so you could understand that mature people can differentiate between fiction and reality, that it's really easy to like something in fiction and not want anything to do with it in real life (which also applies to fictional characters)
fictional CSAM does not exist. CSAM is any sort of material where a REAL child is being abused, exploited or assaulted in any way. the reason this doesn't extend to fictional characters is because they are not real, no child is being directly harmed when someone draws a fictional character in a sexual way. unless the drawing is traced from an image of a real child (or if it's AI-modified pictures of real kids) it doesn't qualify as CSAM. they have absolutely nothing to do with real life children.
try reporting a random manga to the police on the account of it being CSAM and see how seriously they take you.
most mature adults have the ability to distinguish between fiction and reality. if you can't, you shouldn't engage with certain content. this doesn't mean that that content shouldn't exist. it's not the responsibility of authors and artists to care for the random people engaging with their work. this is something that you need to do yourself, you can't expect strangers to not create things simply because you don't like them, are uncomfortable with them or because you don't have the maturity needed to properly process it. the world doesn't revolve around you.
i am not at all talking about child actors and celebrities being sexually represented in movies and media. those are real people, so of course it's wrong to represent them that way. but i am talking about completely fictional characters, anime characters in particular. they have no ties to real life. that's why at the beginning of a book there is that warning that says something like "all character and places in this book are completely fictional. any resemblance to real people, place or events is purely coincidental".
you keep talking about "sexual depictions of children" but why do you never mention that this is about FICTIONAL characters? making the distinction between real people and fictional characters is crucial. of course imagery of real kids in sexual manner is wrong and illegal, but anime characters have no relevance to real life whatsoever. including fictional kids