iirc harada wrote sum concerning pedophillia and it was disturbing, thats what I’ve heard but I’ve never dug into it as much out of my own good lol.
Thank you for explaining!
The other comment is slighty wrong. They are considered "problematic" because their works often have sexual assault. If "Nii-chan" is pedophilic or not is debatable. They show a teen having sex with an adult, but never tried to normalize it and also treat about the psychology of csa victims. In my opinion It's weird, considering in another work ,called "one room one angel", they implied a romantic feeling between a grown man and a middle schooler.
I see…thank you for the details!
Nothing, she's just based.
duuuubious manga and I'm still wondering whether they're a shotacon (the answer should be right in my fucking face but I'm in denial) none of the work I've read from harada was actually vanilla bro some had sa, some were lowkey cheese pizza disguised as something else or both
Cheese pizza??
i don't need to translate that for you, look at the first letters of each word and piece it tg
That's a really weird way of referring to cp huh
Genuinely asking, what’s wrong with the author Harada? I don’t know about their other works