I know this is taboo to say around these parts but I find it truly lazy writing that to create the “character growth” of a hypermasculine presenting or
in this case a character that considers themselves hypermasculine within the sense of the omegaverse is made “vulnerable”by bottoming. There is absolutely nothing wrong with bottoming nor should it matter but it’s a specific trope attributed to how female authors who write male characters in mlm written romance centering sexual position as the remedy for dressing up ingrained patriarchy. I wish it was presented that Alpha wanted to bottom or even still top but relinquish control by becoming verse. Instead he’ll bottom once and then be boxed into this sexual position indefinitely only implying that he was only able to overcome his ideas of masculinity was to literally take on a considered feminine role and call it a day. There’s absolutely no nuance in how even that would affect his ideas of himself and self presentation. Admittedly it’s why I don’t even care for alpha bottoming omegaverse because they lack in the nuance of what would actually mean for a hypermasculine individual raised by nurture and society to assume the role of apex in all aspects of their life.

Genuinely skipping their scenes if the alpha is the bottom