i promise you it isnt that serious lmaooo and girlie there's so many fucking stories with pretty tops so idk what you're on about
why are yall so fucking defensive over this?? literally who cares if people want switching, how does that affect you in any way? grow up
did a switch gay couple kill your parents or something why tf are you so mad about this help
No one is mad about people wanting switching. The point is that we already know there won't be any because the author has explicitly made that clear. So what's the point of bringing it up over and over and over again ?
If the author had left it open-ended, then sure, people could speculate or hope for switching all they want. But that's not the case here. It's already been decided, so constantly asking for it or debating it is just repetitive and, at this point, kind of exhausting and pointless.
It's like walking into a bakery and asking for croissants every damn day after the owner has repeatedly said they don't sell croissants. Like ?? Lmao
At some point, you either accept what the author has decided or find a story that fits your preferences, as simple as that !
this is mangago bruv the author isnt seeing anything on here who gaf if someone likes switches and also yalls logic is backfiring on you. I'm aware you're not the one who said this but the original commenter said something like "we finally have a story with a pretty top" when there's billions of stories with pretty tops and barely any switches. It makes sense people will be talking about switch potential. Who cares? Who is it affecting?
Just saying that it gets repeated.
Apparently we care, because it's a bit annoying when we know that they aren't ever going to switch, (which is what the author said more than a couple chapters ago.)
It's affecting us, because it gets repeated, which in turn, annoys us, because it's redundant.
PS: I never said it's affecting the author when we comment on mangago, though the author definitely knows that there is a part of the fandom who would immensely like for them to switch.
The author acknowledges this, and says that those who would like for them to switch, disagrees with the author's decision for them to remain, and not to switch.
The author has never said anything about the switch likers' being aggressive/etc about wanting them to switch.
The author just acknowledges it, and says that they disagree.
Lmk if I got any details wrong, I honestly forgot probably a lot of details, or something.
Anyways, to put it simply:
Bruv, who gaf if someone dislikes switches and also y'all's logic is backfiring on you. I'm aware you're not the one who said this, but the original commenter said something about it being legit exhausting when the author made it clear that they wouldn't switch.
Second part:
it's like going to a cake shop with your friends, and then having a conversation about how nice it would be if they sold croissants.
Also, repeatedly conversing with the customers about how nice it'd be if this cake shop who put a notice saying "they wouldn't sell croissants" as a reposne, sold croissants.
PS: eh, we like Adrian as a strict bottom for Lorenzo, who we like as a strict top. Like, who gaf? Us, apparently, also y'alls too, apparently?
The reason people are talking about switching so much is because the author literally wrote both characters having a preference for topping, so of course people would actually like to see both of them top each other instead of one being forced into the bottom position like 90% of BL that have this disgusting, overdone trope for a ‘bottom’ to want to top but never get to bc their partner refuses and ignores their wants. These kind of comments infuriate me sm because in what world is wanting to see the most common type of gay sexual relationship (switching) represented more controversial and annoying than comments praising and getting off on a clearly non-consensual relationship. Like, I can count the number of switch stories on this site on one hand but there are an endless amount that romanticize rape. And the argument that the author has stated their positions are fixed so there’s no reason for people to bring up switching is so stupid, people are allowed to want for a story to go in a certain direction even if it’ll never happen and they’re allowed to criticize a weird, boring trope.
We're saying it's getting annoying. You know they'll never switch. If they really want to criticise something that's set in stone, never going to change, so much, then please, leave it be? Idrk.
We know you get bored of strict top / strict bottom dynamic, for you it's the "both of them wanting to top, but only one gets to", type.
Switching is not controversial, we never said that
(well, some probably did, but I didn't, so, message to my lads, lasses, and lassos: Switching is a normal thing in sex.)
Noncon in fiction, is fiction. We do not condone these in real life, there is a separation between fiction and nonfiction.
Fiction can only reflect reality, and it may influence some, but that's why we're taught what's right and wrong.
"Getting off" on fictional noncon is a normal thing, there are many kinks, like voyeurism, latex, etc, etc, common kinks, uncommon kinks.
They are only considered paraphilic when it's so intense that it becomes a danger to the one who has the kink, and or, others in the vicinity.
Some may also view reading about these topics as a form of coping mechanism, (such as kinks, because we know the develop of kinks are most probably connected to trauma.)
Reading about these topics may or may not hurt the reader, it depends. We have to follow our minds and decide if we can handle this. Will this trigger my trauma bad? Will this help me process my trauma? Or, simply. Will I enjoy reading this in a healthy way?
Pornographic material is a normal part of life, well, I certainly recommend less of it, but it's a natural human thing, to read, less than sanitary or sane material.
Why do we like Horror? Why do we like Tragedy? It's because we're only human. The taboos, we get curious of taboos.
We feel a need to explore these in a safe environment, the fictional world.
Anyways, I guess you can just ignore my massive, kind of philosophical segment.
So, there literally is no reason for them to bring up switching, in the comments when they know it isn't going to happen.
Actually, me, replying to myself, there is a reason:
They want to expressed their opinions, which is the whole reason for comments, oh obviously.
Anyways, I guess you won the argument? Idk, is this even an argument, were we arguing? I don't really know.
Please don't call the story boring, it may be weird, but it isn't boring for us, they have a slightly uncommon dynamic here! Sure it's still strict top / strict bottom, but look at how wonderful and unique Adrian is, and Lorenzo's slightly unique too.
When'd we have a British? (Not entirely sure on that...) bottom in a Korean comic?
Never in my life have I encountered another Adrian, and my go to is, MC = bottom, of course I want Adrian to be the strict bottom for Lorenzo's strict top.
Anyways the end of this is, let's just agree that it'd be nice for the switch likers to have them switch.
AND.
It'd be nice for them not to switch, for us switch dislikers.
So on so forth. (am I using this saying right?):
We also get to express our dislike of switching, and our like of them being strict top / strict bottom dynamic.
BECAUSE.
You all also get to express your dislike of them being strict top / strict bottom dynamic, and your like of switching.
So, can we agree to this tie? Let's be as annoying as possible to eachother in the comments, always and forever, till death do us part. (=・ω・=)

People talking about switching, like during season 1 when the author already made it clear their positions would be Enzo top/Rian bottom and no switching, is legit exhausting