https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/19871249/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/19871277/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/19907342/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/19919806/
ttps://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/19963284/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/20005006/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/20718741/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/20447329/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/20465552/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/20846611/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/21201261/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/21511673/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/21525955/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/21572971/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/21615531/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/21769107/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/21911976/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/21912746/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/21915473/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/21918933/
Look at the answer this person gave you
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/22197470/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/22232402/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/22470073/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/22570678/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/22893610/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/22690149/
https://www.mangago.me/home/mangatopic/22616736/
Nah, that's enough . I actually checked every link you sent.
The first 5 were obvious bait (the account even got deleted). 6, 8, 11 and 12 don't support the conclusion you're drawing from them, they're either fandom jokes, vague comments or people talking about the story rather than openly sexualizing it. 7 explained itself. 9 literally admitted it was weak bait. 10 and 23 checked profile and it appears to be from account that seem to farm reactions in every comment section they enter, so I don't think they're reliable examples. 13 doesn't really work either because the author has already drawn them together as adults in extra panels on social media. Same with 26 I don't see how it proves your point. 14, 15, 17, 18, 22 and 25 are from account with the same pattern of posting comments just to stir ppl up. 16 and 27 are simply ppl saying they don't want a timeskip. 19 is just a normal comment. 20 was sarcasm, which I missed at first. 21 is just someone's own thought that I don't really understand.
From all those links, what I got was a mix of genuine weird comments, comments that don't actually support your point and several accounts whose comment history makes them unreliable examples. That's exactly why I don't treat comment sections as evidence. They're probably the worst place to judge a manga or an entire fandom. Ppl troll, exaggerate, joke around and deliberately post outrageous things because they know it'll get attention.
You might disagree with the manga itself, which is completely fine and understandable, but I don't think this is the right place to judge it. Dumping random comments from a comment section doesn't prove what the manga is about, what the average reader believes or whether the manga itself deserves that level of scrutiny. If I judged every community by its worst comments, literally every fandom would look indefensible. Despite all of this, I understand where you're coming from, we just came to very different conclusions.
@Robin
What???? Have you lost your damn mind
You show me proof that I defended rape??? And pedophialia??? Wtf!!
You're gonna say anything now at this point to support your narrative??
What you're doing is utterly disgusting let's start with that and if you can't read or comprehend words properly then don't come and fucking say that I'm defending rape and pedophilia.
OP at least showed proof that's worth something, what about you, taking out bullshit from your arse?? I'd suggest you don't bother interacting with someone bcoz you can do nothing except for accuse others and block coz can't face the truth after blatantly lying
@Robin
Are you actually comprehending what I'm saying or do you just want to argue?
Defending a manga against *unreasonable criticism* is NOT the same as defending rape or pedophilia. I've never had an issue with genuine criticism, my issue was with people making claims that simply don't apply to what's actually being shown.
And where the fuck did "rape" even come from? I literally asked you to show me where I defended pedophilia, and now you're throwing defending rape into it too? Is this really the lowest you'll stoop just to make your agenda work? "Everyone knows" isn't proof of anything. There's zero credibility to this so called "everyone"
OP at least made an actual argument. You came in with nothing but a completely different and disgusting accusation. If you can't distinguish between defending a piece of media against a bad argument and defending rape or pedophilia then you're not arguing with me, you're arguing with a narrative you've made up in your head.
So maybe stop picking fights with anyone who doesn't agree with you with your pathetic excuses and throwing around serious accusations just to get your little moment of attention.

The funniest part is that these mfs defending this shit (or idk, maybe they're just actual pedos atp) keep saying that the people calling it out are the real sick ones because it supposedly has "nothing to do with pedophilia." the whole argument is always some dumb shit like, "you're the one making it weird" "you're the one seeing the kid in a sexual context" or "yall are the ones sexualizing him." meanwhile you scroll down for like 10 seconds and find 6 comments from ppl who enjoy ts saying shit like "i wanna touch that cute shota," "i wanna fuck him," "he's so fucking hot," "i'm hard" or some other degenerate ass garbage. Sooooo what happened to the whole "there's nothing sexual about this" argument? where'd all that "it doesn't cause or promote anything sexual" bs go?
yall literally contradict themselves every single time. At least keep your story straight before trying to moral grandstand. just stfu already and stop embarrassing yourselves even more than you already are.