but it being normalized at that time doesnt mean he isnt a pedo, he objectively is, and it's not a bad thing to mention it, idk why you're so mad about it broo; it's like saying we shouldnt call murderer people who killed women lots of years ago because they thought they were witches, just because it was normal at that time
Maybe it's because I'm so fucking tired of historical manhwas always having some modern-day jerk with their moralism? We all know it's bad, but you must mention it? Doesn't the fact that he's a sick bastard with obvious sadistic tendencies, a lust for power, and a literal murderer bother anyone? And everyone's like, "Yeah, he's a pedophile!" Maybe you're all fucking pedophiles here, but he saw in Psyche innocence and purity, and that's what hooked him. But nooooo, let's just pedo-pedo him, thats sooo smart!
It’s pedophilia. Idk why you’re crying about except if you’re one yourself. Being attracted to a kid is pedophilia by definition. « Moralism » and its calling out an adult attracted to a teen. Imagine getting mad at people cause you see kids and teenagers as potential partners. You’re the problem here, I hope this is clear. « Innocence and purity » the same as we see in babies ? Is this the hill you wanna die on ? Because the word lacking is child like innocence and purity and guess what ? We call them pedophiles so now you can put a name on what you are

i had high hopes for this so should i read it or not