Responses
That was a test request form I think, not a document saying he was actually the father
Maybe I have to reread it again, but he mentioned in the end that he was a father of supposedly the niece of fl, but maybe I am misunderstanding some things because of the translation but so far that is what I understood in the last chapter
This doesn't make sense at all, like I know there is a clear difference in results if the child is related to the person as a father or uncle. There will be like a HUGE difference in the genetic result and I am sure about it. If the baby was from his brother it won't say that he is the father and it will be VERY clear. I feel like this author didn't even do that research or unless there is magic involved but still it is 100% not correct or it can also be because someone messed with the paternity tests. Haaaaa, this gave me a headache, I am curious how the author will solve this dilemma or misuse of information.