same here..... ┗( T﹏T )┛
I figure mainly trying to say that you can't ever replace someone or something with another. You'll always have the memories and feeling for that specific thing. Even if it's replaced by something exactly the same, there will always be differences. So basically, nothing can be replaced, no matter how are you try.
But at the same time, she also shows how that very replacement brings happiness to people. I haven't read the latest chapter, but the chapter with the singer shows very that. The manager sincerely thought the creator was God, that it was the right thing to do. So really, I don't get it.
Are you expecting the author to say, "This is wrong" or "This is right"? Are we to nod like sheep to someone's convictions, or are we to see both good and bad and make our own decisions? Technology is neutral; how we use and interpret it is up to us.
the author has a thing to create masterpieces about topics that are hard to judge if they were good or bad. the philosophy in their work is one of the reasons I just love them and enjoy them to the fullest. they let you think about the topic without directly telling you what you should think.
I don't get what the author is trying to convey there.